The Beatles: Which is better?

Post by **TheCatt** » Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:06 pm

My wife likes their early stuff, I prefer the latter.

Post by **GORDON** » Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:18 pm

I think the later stuff is more polished, while their earlier stuff sounds more garage-bandy, and I don't like the garage band sound.

Post by **TheCatt** » Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:44 pm

The early stuff, while good, just sounds repetitive to me. The later stuff has more variety, more content.

WSGrundy · Post by **WSGrundy** » Sun Jul 29, 2007 8:05 pm

I enjoy them both but the later stuff is better. The early stuff is just fun pop music.

Post by **Leisher** » Mon Jul 30, 2007 1:14 pm

The early stuff made them and was more "pop".

The later stuff was politically fueled and was more..."alternative"?

I'm going to vote early. Reason: No Yoko.

Malcolm · Post by **Malcolm** » Mon Jul 30, 2007 1:29 pm

Leisher wrote:I'm going to vote early. Reason: No Yoko.

That was the one of the key points for me.

Also, early on everyone'd the same problems that'd later develop into a full-blown hissyfit (George's nerves, Paul's drugs, John's insanity, & Ringo's being the worst drummer in fucking history), but in the first half of their careers they just put up w\ it & still cranked out decent tunes. Certainly more pop than interesting, though.

Edited By Malcolm on 1185816572