Page 3 of 5
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:03 pm
by Leisher
I think the major thing that these companies are missing in terms of why their sales are low is that nobody understands why they need to buy yet another device featuring yet another format.
People are sick of changing out all the machines in their homes and the media that goes with it.
Look at PCs. How many people (hell, even companies) do you know that are trying to make their PC(s) last forever? How many people still haven't purchased a digital TV? How many people still use cameras that require film? How many people still use VCRs?
People don't want to constantly upgrade just because corporate America thinks we need to get a better picture even if the difference is only noticeable by highly trained eyes. Want proof? Go ask any woman to compare the picture between two TVs, one in 720i and the other in 1080p. They will tell you that there is no difference, meanwhile you're told the difference is HUGE.
Now we're told that our DVD players suck. Oh, and so do our existing DVDs. Don't forget that your cable from the DVD player to the TV sucks!
It could be argued that plasma TVs never reached "affordable" for most people and now they're moving onto new technologies.
There will always be technophiles willing to jump onto any new technology, but the majority of folks are more hesitant. These companies need to do a better job of explaining to people why they "need" HD-DVD or Bluray.
Edited By Leisher on 1199905531
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:24 pm
by Malcolm
Why should people care? Cos one day their DVD player or VCR will break & they might not be able to find a replacement or it ain't compatible w\ their new hardware. DVDs get cracked, tapes break, electronics fizzle out.
The real question is how long before it becomes virtually impossible to get anything in a particular format. How long before one'll be virtually forced to buy shit in Blu-Ray?
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:43 pm
by TheCatt
I love my Model T.
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 3:16 pm
by Leisher
Why should people care? Cos one day their DVD player or VCR will break & they might not be able to find a replacement or it ain't compatible w\ their new hardware. DVDs get cracked, tapes break, electronics fizzle out.
The real question is how long before it becomes virtually impossible to get anything in a particular format. How long before one'll be virtually forced to buy shit in Blu-Ray?
That's the point though...they're forcing people into new stuff. That's why people don't run out to upgrade because they know eventually they'll be forced into adapting.
I won't buy a HD-DVD or BluRay for a LOOOOOOOOONG time because I've got 200+ movies on DVD and threw out 200+ movies on VHS back in the late 90s. I'm not going to do that every ten years.
They can either make shit backwards compatible or I'll just steal everything.
And I'm a technophile. I love new technology. Imagine how the average consumer feels.
Edited By Leisher on 1199909839
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:49 pm
by TheCatt
They're not forcing anything. They don't have guns, nor laws to make you buy their stuff.
VHS -> DVD was a much larger leap than DVD -> BR/HD is in terms of convenience, quality. So I expect it would take a while anyway. It's not a question of consumers not wanting to be forced. Besides, we've all seen this movie before, and the stuff will be a lot cheaper in a few years.
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:49 pm
by GORDON
Actually, I've heard that the high def players are not only backward compatible with DVDs, but they are also "upscalers," supposedly making regular DVDs look much better.
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 5:35 pm
by Malcolm
Leisher wrote:That's the point though...they're forcing people into new stuff. That's why people don't run out to upgrade because they know eventually they'll be forced into adapting.
I won't buy a HD-DVD or BluRay for a LOOOOOOOOONG time because I've got 200+ movies on DVD and threw out 200+ movies on VHS back in the late 90s. I'm not going to do that every ten years.
Who says the companies gotta do what the consumers want? All they gotta do is produce shit that you'll probably buy.
Hell, here's a biz idea. There's probably legal shit involved, but let's say that if a new customer buys a flick from us, we not only sell it but offer an option (for a price) that when this flick comes out in a new format, we'll send you one of those at your request for a small fee (smaller than the cost of buying the thing in the new format).
And we could have a service that'll translate any format into any other format.
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 5:54 pm
by Vince
I can already download hi def movies off the internet down to my 360. Haven't done a hi def (only standard) but after about 5 minutes you can start watching, so I'd think very soon (within 3 years) that will be a very viable alternative to either HD DVD or Blu Ray and someone's going to lose a shit load of money.
I hope it's Sony, because they're Satan.
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:04 pm
by Malcolm
Hi-def downloads'll be popular when broadband improves.
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:35 pm
by TheCatt
Malcolm wrote:Hi-def downloads'll be popular when broadband improves.
God I hope it improves.
I want to host my own servers, but don't have enough uplink bandwidth.
So I got two .Net/SQL hosting companies.
1 allows me to upload code, manage SQL using my own tools, etc.
The other restricts all DB access to the local server, and doesn't allow for calling web services from code.
Guess which costs 3x the other?
If I could just get T1 speeds at home... all would be well. Hey TPR, want to outsource some of your bandwidth?
Edited By TheCatt on 1199921768
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:43 am
by Leisher
They're not forcing anything. They don't have guns, nor laws to make you buy their stuff.
Providing consumers with only options you want them to have is "forcing" them into what you want them to do. Or maybe I just haven't noticed the new releases on laserdisc and beta at my local video store?
If you don't like the word "force" pick something else for me. Point being, if you want to take part in the technology where you can rent/buy movies and watch them at home, then you'll find that your options are limited by what the manufacturers want them to be. Not saying the manufacturers are wrong for focusing on certain products rather than everything ever invented, I'm just saying that they should perfect the products they have before moving on. Give the public some breathing room.
It's the Donkey Kong Country debate...(bonus points if you have any idea what that was about.)
Actually, I've heard that the high def players are not only backward compatible with DVDs, but they are also "upscalers," supposedly making regular DVDs look much better.
I have heard the exact opposite. Somebody far less lazy than Gordon or I needs to look this up. If both formats are backwards compatible with regular DVDs, then they need to advertise the shit out of that. I've heard a LOT of folks are hesitant because they don't want to replace their libraries. Knowing they won't have to would be a pretty big selling point.
Hi-def downloads'll be popular when broadband improves.
The drawback of downloads is that collectors won't care as much. A LOT of DVD sales are for collectors and who wants a collection that nobody can see? I think you'll see movie rentals become a big deal online, but the majority of sales will still be done through brick and mortars, Amazon, etc.
The real question is when does the next format hit? Maybe movies will be available on flash drives soon.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:51 am
by GORDON
Leisher wrote:Actually, I've heard that the high def players are not only backward compatible with DVDs, but they are also "upscalers," supposedly making regular DVDs look much better.
I have heard the exact opposite. Somebody far less lazy than Gordon or I needs to look this up. If both formats are backwards compatible with regular DVDs, then they need to advertise the shit out of that. I've heard a LOT of folks are hesitant because they don't want to replace their libraries. Knowing they won't have to would be a pretty big selling point.
Actually, I'm pretty sure about that. I've been paying better-than-average attention to this stuff, and what I read is that "at least these players will still play regular DVDs, upconverted." I've even seen conversations about how some regular DVD's look so good upconverted that it isn't even worth buying the HD version.
I'll post a link to something official next time I see it.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:02 am
by GORDON
First blu-ray player i saw on amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Samsung....&sr=8-1
Technical Details
* plays Blu-ray high-definition discs (selectable output resolution: 1080p signals available through HDMI output only; 720p/1080i signals available through HDMI or component video)
* plays DVD-Video and DVD-R & DVD-RW
* plays CD, audio CD-R & CD-RW, and MP3 CDs
* selectable 720p/1080i/1080p video upconversion for DVD (upconverted video available through HDMI output only)
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:06 pm
by Leisher
Nice.
Now I've really got to point out how stupid these jackholes are in pushing this technology forward.
The very first thing they should be leading with is "Will play regular DVDs!"
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:12 pm
by GORDON
Yeah, I can pretty much agree with that. Everything I know about the tech I've had to actively search out. You'd think the manufacturers would, like, volunteer a little information at me.
BTW, one of the big "It looks better with an upconverted standard DVD than on native hidef" products was season 1 of Battlestar Galactica.
But generally I've heard that standard DVD's, upconverted, improve quality from slightly to "damned near looks hidef," depending on the DVD.
Edited By GORDON on 1200075208
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:36 pm
by Leisher
It really shocks me because Sony learned this lesson with the PS2. They made it backwards compatible so the PS1 games would play on it. Meanwhile, their prime competitor at the time, Nintendo said "fuck backwards compatibility".
Sony won that war like the German tanks against the Polish cavalry.
The backwards compatibility thing was a HUGE issue and Sony acknowledged it as such, so why ignore it in this arena? It doesn't make sense...unless...they're purposely withholding the info for now because their current core audience are technophiles. They might figure that the technophiles will buy anything, therefore, let them think they need to get the HD movies, then later, when the prices are into the "mass market range", we'll publicize the hell out of the backwards compatibility thing.
Oh, and to be honest, I have an upconvert DVD player with a $100 HDMI cable and I don't see the difference.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:38 pm
by GORDON
Do you have a hi def TV?
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:46 pm
by Leisher
Of course.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:48 pm
by GORDON
I remember you discussing it, but I don't remember you making a decision.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:42 pm
by GORDON
This is an amazon review of a particular Samsung Blu-Ray player.
Significant for illustrating the problem of Sony's built in, and ever changing, DRM and its effect on these players.
I have a BD-P1400, a PS3, and an Xbox 360 + HD-DVD drive. In the month that I've had the Samsung it's done a terrific job on video and audio quality. I'm playing it on a 46" Samsung LN-T4665F connected through HDMI. That's the good news, and it's certainly good. I've never had any of the stutters or other audio/video glitches that others have mentioned. On the other hand, here are the quirks that I've run into: (1) The Samsung takes by far the longest of my three players to load movies, and simply responding to an eject/open request takes 30 seconds for some reason (even when there's no disc inside). There's no feedback to tell you what's happening during eject, so you wonder if it's hung or actively thinking about it. (2) The Blu-ray movie producers in their infinite wisdom keep changing their DRM formats as their latest ones get hacked, which is an unbelievably customer unfriendly decision. The BR players are all updatable so it's conceptually possible to play the latest movies. Unfortunantely, the Samsung has a VERY unintuitive failure mode and upgrade procedure, which likely makes this required operation out of reach for most people on this device. Here's my (very long) step by step experience, which I hope will help give you a tangible understanding of what it's like, as well as potentially out anyone else similarly stuck. I ran into this with the new Live Free or Die Hard DVD, which after the usual 45 second or so load process simply hung the player. It wouldn't respond to any input (play, stop, menu, etc), the counter read "0000", and the screen remained black. I had heard about the DRM format issue, so suspected that this could be the potential problem - unfortunately I had bought that DVD on its first day of release and tried to play it that night so no one else had posted about their problems with that config yet. Following the manual's instructions, I plugged in a enet cable and tried to pick up the latest update. For some reason it didn't successfully get a DHCP address on my network, so I manually entered the network info. It told me that there was a new update available, so I selected download. When the download process strated, again these was no way to tell whether it was hung or actively working, and no way to tell how much progress it had made and how much more it still needed. As a result, after about 30 or 45 minutes I cancelled and tried again. (BTW, I'm connected through a Verizon FiOS fiber-optic connection that's as fast as any consumer internet in the US). After 20 minutes I gave up and went to bed, leaving it to (maybe) download overnight. In the morning, the machine was off but it when I powered it up I learned that it had not completed the upgrade. In retrospect I believe this is what happened: the download eventually completed, it put up a "do you want to upgrade your firmware" dialog box, and after a couple minutes of inactivity it timed out and eventually turned off. Nice design, their engineers clearly did not try this in their homes. I gave it one more try in the morning, leaving it running while I ate breakfast and did email. After an hour or so the download completed, the "do you want to upgrade" dialog came up, and I said "yes" before it timed out. The upgrade completed successfully, but unfortunatley the Live Free or Die Hard movie still hung the player. At this point I suspected a faulty disc, so I got a replacement from the retailer. The new disc had the same problem, though, which told me that this was a player bug. Since the movie had been out for a day, I found a couple posts of other people having problems including one that got a confirmation from Samsung support. I called support, who eventually told me that the version 1.2 firmware on the website would fix the issue (hint, you need to know exactly what to ask and be persistent since this person would have sent me away with false information if I hadn't kept clarifying her responses). Going to the website, I found the alternate method of upgrading the firmware that the support person desribed, downloading a zip file to a PC, loading the .iso to a CD-R or CD-RW, and playing that on the player. I hadn't found this in the user's manual, but it certainly couldn't be any worse than the online method I had gone through in the previous 24 hours. Interestingly, there was no obvious way to relate the "version 1.2" available on the website with the version I had upgraded to online that morning (the online version uses a long date code instead of a version number). With nothing to lose, I went ahead and tried using a CD-RW using the instructions posted on the web. No luck, the player didn't recognize it as a firmware update. I tried again with a CD-R. Still no luck. Still clinging to a tiny shred of hope that (a) the "version 1.2" might actually fix the problem, and (b) the version 1.2 might have been posted to the web that day after I did my upgrade in the morning - a day after a major blockbuster movie that required it was released nationwide, but who's counting - I tried the painful online update process again. Lo and behold, a new update was available that might be version 1.2 (?) I went through the update, and the movie worked! Wow. This is a lot more detail than you likely need to make a buying decision, unless you read this and say "wow, reading those details tells me that this machine requires a lot more technical messing around than I'm comfortable with just to watch a movie". Potentially this might help someone else who has already bought the player figure out why a new movie hangs the box mysteriously - I would have LOVED to find this two days ago. Maybe Samsung will even read it and start to understand how painful their current usability is, even for a moderately technical user.