Flying Kids

Stuff we should click on.  Be sure to state Not Work Safe, if applicable.  KTHX.
User avatar
Cakedaddy
Posts: 9480
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 6:52 pm

Post by Cakedaddy »

TPRJones wrote:At 10 seconds if it weren't for the rope it would have flipped, not flown. Certainly not flown up over a two-story apartment complex.

The second one is irrelevant because if you pause it and study the design (hard to do with the shaking, but I got lucky) it actually has lifting surfaces built into it to act as wings. The Little Tikes bouncy castle doesn't even have a roof to act as a wing, so it's much more like your regular inner tube than the manta ray glider.

When you go tubing and it glides up to 50' high above the boat with you on it, then I'll believe it is possible.
You have to play with more tubes, outside, in the wind. I can't explain the physics. But I KNOW tubes fly with no passengers.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

Well I certainly hope that people will stop talking about the fact I didn't believe some mythbusters results and use this thread, instead.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TPRJones
Posts: 13418
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:05 pm
Location: Houston
Contact:

Post by TPRJones »

Hey, if Mythbusters proves me wrong I'll believe them. Well, as long as it's part of the 70% of things they do reasonably well, and not the 30% where they make some glaringly obvious mistake and need to go back and try again. :p
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 58745
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

TPRJones wrote:Hey, if Mythbusters proves me wrong I'll believe them. Well, as long as it's part of the 70% of things they do reasonably well, and not the 30% where they make some glaringly obvious mistake and need to go back and try again. :p
We already know you're wrong.

People keep saying MB make mistakes, etc, but I've never seen much evidence of it.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by Malcolm »

People keep saying MB make mistakes, etc, but I've never seen much evidence of it.

They totally fucked up the hangover experiment.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
User avatar
Cakedaddy
Posts: 9480
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 6:52 pm

Post by Cakedaddy »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xm2HhYCYLI
At 45 seconds, is that tube flipping, or flying? The only reason those tubes don't continue to stay air born is the drivers are cutting the throttle. A flying tube crashing into the other rider hurts.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_0UCh38oh4
At 3:10, the wipe out occurs and the tube is nosediving into the water. When the tube comes back into frame, it's on an upward trajectory until the tow rope pulls the front down and the tube dives again. These tubes want to fly.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxxlennWaLM
At 10 seconds, is that tube just flipping?
User avatar
Cakedaddy
Posts: 9480
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 6:52 pm

Post by Cakedaddy »

Ya, at this point, multiple people on this board have witnessed first hand, inflatables flying. Not our fault you've never seen it.
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 58745
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

Malcolm wrote:
People keep saying MB make mistakes, etc, but I've never seen much evidence of it.
They totally fucked up the hangover experiment.
Good explanation there. I'm convinced.
It's not me, it's someone else.
TPRJones
Posts: 13418
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:05 pm
Location: Houston
Contact:

Post by TPRJones »

Cakedaddy wrote:At 45 seconds, is that tube flipping, or flying?

...

Ya, at this point, multiple people on this board have witnessed first hand, inflatables flying. Not our fault you've never seen it.

It's flying, but it also has much more flat surface area than the bouncy house in the news story and isn't loaded down with kids.

Show me a video or tell me a truthful first hand account of one of these tubes of a similar size to the small bouncy castle loaded down with similar weight flying 50' into the air and staying up there for a couple of city blocks and then I'll believe, because that is what is being claimed as having happened in this news story. So far I've seen nothing even remotely close to that and no evidence that it should be possible given the circumstances reported. The manta ray one could do it, but it's different because it has built-in lifting surfaces as part of the design.

What I will do, however, is shut up about it for now. Fair enough? :)




Edited By TPRJones on 1400173545
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by Malcolm »

TheCatt wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
People keep saying MB make mistakes, etc, but I've never seen much evidence of it.
They totally fucked up the hangover experiment.
Good explanation there. I'm convinced.
They tried to measure hangover severity and recovery time without using:

- similar drunks
- similar alcoholic drinks
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Post Reply