Consoles adjust for inflation

Mostly PC, but console and mobile too
Post Reply
Paul
Posts: 8458
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: KY
Contact:

Post by Paul »

Well I was going to post a picture, but it'd screw up the frames.

Link to pic:
http://i.imgur.com/nBN0mbS.jpg




Edited By Paul on 1387285301
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 58739
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

Microsoft should have learned from XBox and XBox 360 that 300-400 is the sweet spot.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by Malcolm »

Jesus. Aside from the Wii U, everything Nintendo touched was a home run.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 58739
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

I don't remember the GameCube being a homerun.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by Malcolm »

TheCatt wrote:I don't remember the GameCube being a homerun.
Eh, alright. Maybe a second place finish when you were expecting a strikeout. Sold about 2M fewer units than the XBox, but the Gamecube cost 2/3 as much. PS2 destroyed them both. I remember playing the fuck out of Super Smash Bros Melee.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 58739
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

Malcolm wrote:
TheCatt wrote:I don't remember the GameCube being a homerun.
Eh, alright. Maybe a second place finish when you were expecting a strikeout. Sold about 2M fewer units than the XBox, but the Gamecube cost 2/3 as much. PS2 destroyed them both.
I think that makes it a 3rd place finish.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by Malcolm »

Pretty sure they were selling XBoxes for a loss. Yep.
Per-unit losses on the original Xbox were estimated at $125, and about the same amount for the Xbox 360 at launch.


Found some places saying the GC sold at a "small loss." I think it's safe to say that it was less than $125, or near 50% of it's selling price.

From here.
Total Nintendo GameCube games sold as of September 30, 2013: 208.57 million.


And from here.
Total Xbox Games Sold: 104,000,000


Nintendo took a smaller loss on about 90% of the volume for the hardware. They pushed out twice as many game (software) units.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 58739
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

Xbox was something new, GameCube was building on Nintendo's legacy and history. Given the success with 360 that the XBox setup, Xbox > GameCube.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by Malcolm »

Something new? A retarded computer that played glorified CD-ROMs? Totally no predecessor.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Post Reply