more proof MS is run by fucktards

Malcolm · Post by **Malcolm** » Fri Jun 07, 2013 1:24 pm

From here.

Internet Explorer uses up to 18 percent less energy than Google Chrome (version 26) and Mozilla Firefox (version 21)

Yep, because that's what I care about when I pick browsers.

Post by **thibodeaux** » Fri Jun 07, 2013 1:38 pm

If it's on your phone you might.

Malcolm · Post by **Malcolm** » Fri Jun 07, 2013 1:45 pm

thibodeaux wrote:If it's on your phone you might.

Yeah, but then I'd have to have a Windows phone.

Post by **Leisher** » Fri Jun 07, 2013 2:29 pm

Yeah, I think this thread should have been titled "I'm going to show my bias against MS with a lame excuse".

You're like the liberal on my FB wall that supports Obama to the death, yet today is bitching about gas prices, while completely ignoring the 4 scandals.

Point: There are bigger fish to fry. When you start complaining about little stuff like this, you're the problem.

Post by **TheCatt** » Fri Jun 07, 2013 2:50 pm

Realistically, Microsoft needs whatever wins they can get... so this is a way of saying "look, we are relevant-ish again" "we're cutting edge" "we're green"

Malcolm · Post by **Malcolm** » Fri Jun 07, 2013 2:59 pm

When you start complaining about little stuff like this, you're the problem.

MS is touting their energy efficiency for the latest version their browser that used to have 90% of the market share. They didn't lose those points because they use to much electricity.

EDIT: Was actually closer to 95%. From here.

Edited By Malcolm on 1370631676

Post by **Leisher** » Fri Jun 07, 2013 3:40 pm

Realistically, Microsoft needs whatever wins they can get... so this is a way of saying "look, we are relevant-ish again" "we're cutting edge" "we're green"

Exactly.

Post by **TPRJones** » Tue Jun 11, 2013 9:22 am

I'm with Malcolm on this. It's like they're trying to sell the Ford Pinto by talking about the nice gas mileage while ignoring the fact that they keep exploding.