Transformers 3

Post by **Leisher** » Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:07 am

Release date set.

I assume they'll wait to see if part 2 does any good at the box office...

Post by **Leisher** » Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:11 am

WSGrundy · Post by **WSGrundy** » Sat Jun 12, 2010 7:48 am

I love how the article talks about them trying to fix the problems and making fans happy and then picks another villain that changed into a gun.

Both his and megatrons transformed modes were stupid in their original toy forms but saying you are going to try and please the purists this time around and then picking a robot you are going to have to change doesn't make much sense.

Malcolm · Post by **Malcolm** » Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:38 pm

Is Starscream more than just another clunking hulk of nondescript metal? & one (almost) wonders how they'll write out the raging biatch.

Post by **TPRJones** » Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:09 am

They don't have to worry about making the hardcore fans happy if they'll just make a movie that's not shit.

Post by **GORDON** » Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:08 am

My 4 year old LOVES these movies. As long as part 3 makes him happy, I don't care.

Post by **TPRJones** » Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:29 pm

You're a parent. That kills your standards. You'll give 10 out of 10 to anything that keeps the kid out of your hair.

Post by **GORDON** » Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:31 pm

True. But I was also making a subtle point that these movies, so far, really appeal to 4 year old males. Too bad.

Post by **GORDON** » Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:01 pm

Michael Bay answers the question "Were the moon landings faked?" with a definitive NO... and yes.

<object style="height: 390px; width: 640px"><param name="movie" value=" name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></object>

Post by **TPRJones** » Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:34 pm

Unexpected. Interesting. But I already see one hugely major technical flaw that could be a problem. Not that that sort of thing would stop Michael Bay, I guess.

Post by **Leisher** » Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:41 pm

That video is gone.

Post by **GORDON** » Fri Dec 31, 2010 11:17 am

Leisher wrote:That video is gone.

This one is working.

<object width="480" height="204"><param name="movie" value=" name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="" width="480" height="204" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object>
Transformers Dark of the Moon trailer
Uploaded by teasertrailer. - <a target="_self" href="http://www.dailymotion.com/us/channel/shortfilms">Full seasons and entire episodes online.</a>

Post by **GORDON** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:53 pm

New trailer.
<object width="480" height="209"><param name="movie" value=" name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="" width="480" height="209" wmode="transparent" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object>
Transformers 3 Dark of the Moon by teasertrailer

Post by **GORDON** » Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:05 pm

Welp, that was a movie, all right.

Post by **GORDON** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:32 pm

Took a day to digest this flick a bit.

1. Another movie suggesting that skyscrapers can tilt and lean at a 40 degree angle and not fold up.

2. Optimus Prime might be the most brutal "good guy" since "The Bride" in Kill Bill. If you had as many slow-motion, graphic executions of humans in a movie instead of robots, this flick would be a hard-R, easily. Also he executes more helpless robots in cold lubricant, like in the 2nd movie.

3. Completely unrealistic how Sam Witwicky keeps pulling in the supermodels. Specifically, a supermodel who isn't interested in her handsome, charismatic, billionaire boss and instead likes Sam's poor, unemployed ass (but hey.... Loverboy Can't Buy Me Love). And her entrance in the movie was a long, lingering shot of her panty-clad ass. Not that I'm complaining about that part, but her opening 3 or 4 lines all we can see is a closeup of her ass. Stay Classy, Michael Bay.

4. The new robot has a famous actor as a voice, and that particular robot kept repeating lines from the voice-actor's previous iconic movies. Kept pulling me out of the film when they did that when I would hear the line and think, "Hey, yeah, just like when he said that in that other movie."

5. The robot space shuttle was, like, "huh?"

6. I'm still not really sure what the big robot worm was doing, or why.

Post by **Leisher** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:40 pm

3. Completely unrealistic how Sam Witwicky keeps pulling in the supermodels. Specifically, a supermodel who isn't interested in her handsome, charismatic, billionaire boss and instead likes Sam's poor, unemployed ass (but hey.... Loverboy Can't Buy Me Love). And her entrance in the movie was a long, lingering shot of her panty-clad ass. Not that I'm complaining about that part, but her opening 3 or 4 lines all we can see is a closeup of her ass. Stay Classy, Michael Bay.

In his defense, he does claim to have banged Megan Fox on set.

Post by **GORDON** » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:45 pm

And I thought I couldn't think any less of Megan Fox...

Post by **Leisher** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 8:47 am

I don't know, I'm starting to respect Shia. He doesn't seem to care what comes out of his mouth and who he pisses off.

Post by **TPRJones** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:45 am

Yeah, ever since he admitted that Indy 4 was shit, I kind of like the guy a little.

There's hope for him yet.

Post by **GORDON** » Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:48 am

Sympathy for Shia?

No no no nO no NO NO NO NO NO.