Leisher wrote: In related news, does anyone watch Bill Maher? Has he been bashing Trump's comments on women? If so, I'd love to know what he said because that's a guy with a history of treating women with disrespect.
Really? Because I'm primarily tuning in to see if he's entertaining. That's my standard for watching an entertainer.I just don't understand why humor gets you a free pass to push a specific agenda of propaganda.
You're halfway correct. When George gets his own talk show and writing staff, then does bits like this, he'll get the same pass. Sorry the right is presently too lazy, confused, self-destructive, repulsive, and reeling from watching the shittiest candidate piss away their chances right down the toilet to convince Dennis Miller it's time to come out of retirement with his own 30-minute cable news parody. I sure as hell can't think of anyone else who'd have a shot.We've all condemned folks like George Clooney for Oliver's level of smugness and condescension, but apparently it's because his message didn't have jokes.
Hell, I saw him in person a couple weeks ago. Yet again, the bar is entertainment.In related news, does anyone watch Bill Maher? Has he been bashing Trump's comments on women? If so, I'd love to know what he said because that's a guy with a history of treating women with disrespect.
Reality TV Party Senators getting destroyed by their opponents.The Pew report focused on technical inefficiencies in our voting system rather than actual fraud. It found that 24 million voter registrations in the United States are either invalid or have significant inaccuracies, 2.75 million people are registered in more than one state, 12 million records have the wrong address, and almost 2 million deceased individuals are still on the rolls. These problems are attributed to outdated registration systems rather than chicanery, however, and their proposed solutions are practical rather than alarmist, including cross-referencing registration lists, improving techniques for spotting out-of-date records, and allowing voters to register online.
Trump supporters ready to battle Frankenstein.In their Oct. 10 debate, McCain (Ariz.) didn't really have an answer for why, as his opponent, Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick (D) pointed out, he had endorsed Trump more than 60 times — then pulled the plug this month after the hot-mic tape was reported.
...
In Monday's Pennsylvania Senate debate, Toomey was asked by the moderator three times to give a “yes or no” answer on whether he would support Trump for president.
Three times, Toomey dodged.
“I have not reached a point where I can endorse Donald Trump, because I have so many concerns about his candidacy,” he finally said, later adding: “At some point” he “probably will” say for whom he's going to vote, “but there is more ethics we need to talk about.”
...
In his debate Friday, one of the Senate's most vulnerable incumbents, Ron Johnson (Wis.), wouldn't say Trump's name in his debate with former senator Russ Feingold (D). Seriously. Johnson's response to whether he'd continue to support Trump despite the The Tape ™ is 72 words long, with not one mention of the GOP nominee's name
Clarke says the scandal has only galvanized Trump's supporters.
"We’re in such a lewd place now with this campaign. It sickens the American people," Clarke told Mike Gousha Sunday on Madison, Wisconsin, TV station WKOW. "[The tape scandal has] rallied his base, including women who support Trump. They came out swinging, came out with pitchforks and torches to support their candidate.
All 2 million of those dead people are registered in Chicago.The Pew report focused on technical inefficiencies in our voting system rather than actual fraud. It found that 24 million voter registrations in the United States are either invalid or have significant inaccuracies, 2.75 million people are registered in more than one state, 12 million records have the wrong address, and almost 2 million deceased individuals are still on the rolls. These problems are attributed to outdated registration systems rather than chicanery, however, and their proposed solutions are practical rather than alarmist, including cross-referencing registration lists, improving techniques for spotting out-of-date records, and allowing voters to register online.
Another Democrat trying to steal the election.Troy wrote:I'm registered to vote in GA too, just got a notice.
We should at least have new corrupt assholes every so often instead of the same ones. This idea isn't 100% horrible, so I can only assume it's not his. Anyhow, that brief respite of sanity was brought to you by the 24-7 psychosis of Cheeto's Folly.At a second rally in Colorado, Mr. Trump added specificity, saying he would limit House lawmakers to three terms, or six years, and senators to two terms, or 12 years.
"Even though we're doing pretty well in the polls, I don't believe the polls anymore," Trump said Tuesday during a rally here.
Not only is that the only productive thing he's ever said, it's actually making me consider whether or not that single promise is worth my vote.At a second rally in Colorado, Mr. Trump added specificity, saying he would limit House lawmakers to three terms, or six years, and senators to two terms, or 12 years.
It doesn't matter, because the time has come for a female president.Leisher wrote:Not only is that the only productive thing he's ever said, it's actually making me consider whether or not that single promise is worth my vote.At a second rally in Colorado, Mr. Trump added specificity, saying he would limit House lawmakers to three terms, or six years, and senators to two terms, or 12 years.
Sadly, that's how a lot of people vote.Alhazad wrote:It doesn't matter, because the time has come for a female president.Leisher wrote:Not only is that the only productive thing he's ever said, it's actually making me consider whether or not that single promise is worth my vote.At a second rally in Colorado, Mr. Trump added specificity, saying he would limit House lawmakers to three terms, or six years, and senators to two terms, or 12 years.
Exactly. It's just words.TPRJones wrote:It's not a promise he can deliver. It would take Congress to do it, and I can't see them working with him on anything for any reason. And certainly not working with him to limit their own power.
OK, so what if we did have term limits? What, we get fewer politicians and more Trumps?Leisher wrote:You two are a couple of dream killers.
Without question.TheCatt wrote:OK, so what if we did have term limits? What, we get fewer politicians and more Trumps?Leisher wrote:You two are a couple of dream killers.
Yeah, reality's a bitch.You two are a couple of dream killers.
Between this and this...However, you'd hope that it would also mean less corruption, new ideas, harder to pass bullshit, etc.
I have to wonder if you've started hitting the hookah bar on your lunch breaks. Less corruption? Hah. Less bullshit? No chance.it's actually making me consider whether or not that single promise is worth my vote.
Will never happen.No more riders.
Will happen less often than the "no riders" idea.Convention of states. At the mock trial run they passed an amendment to limit congressional and senate terms.
If only the morons from their respective districts stopped putting them in office.They write the rules, fuck you.
