I've asked a few times for someone to name a place where the environment wouldn't eventually kill you unless you were sheltered, but I haven't gotten one yet.TheCatt wrote:Shelter and clothing are not a need.TPRJones wrote:Yes, we are, but I'm trying to establish a definition of "need" beyond just an arbitrary list of food, shelter, and clothing. Since an actual concrete definition hasn't been forthcoming, trying to feel one out by selected examples seemed the way to go.
Would you agree that someone working as a racecar driver "need" some sort of automotive?
Cell/smart phones.... luxuries? Needs?
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
The concrete definition was back in the first (or so) page when I linked wikipedia. It even went a little beyond "food and shelter" but I let it slide.TPRJones wrote:Yes, we are, but I'm trying to establish a definition of "need" beyond just an arbitrary list of food, shelter, and clothing. Since an actual concrete definition hasn't been forthcoming, trying to feel one out by selected examples seemed the way to go.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
But you don't need that job to survive, you just want it for the extra bennies. You could survive by digging ditches for money which wouldn't require the smart phone.TPRJones wrote:Stranger, would you at least acknowledge that someone with the job of computer programmer "needs" a computer in order to do their job? Or is that also a luxury?
The "smart phone" being the original point of this entire thread, btw. Everything else has just been youse guys busting my balls.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TheCatt wrote:No, the concrete definition is what you need to survive: food, water, air, sleep, and warmth. You need nothing else.
There were people who possessed all these things and still died. You might have a template for a base starting list for humanity there, but to say your short list is it ... no way.
Edited By Malcolm on 1442267574
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
There are people who possess everything in the world and still die.Malcolm wrote:There were people who possessed all these things and still died. You might have a template for a base starting list for humanity there, but to say your short list is it ... no way.TheCatt wrote:No, the concrete definition is what you need to survive: food, water, air, sleep, and warmth. You need nothing else.
Stupid argument.
It's not me, it's someone else.
TheCatt wrote:Malcolm wrote:TheCatt wrote:No, the concrete definition is what you need to survive: food, water, air, sleep, and warmth. You need nothing else.
There were people who possessed all these things and still died. You might have a template for a base starting list for humanity there, but to say your short list is it ... no way.
There are people who possess everything in the world and still die.
Stupid argument.
No, their survival was fucked because some type of need wasn't met. If you're a physical invalid, you need food and water. You also need someone or something to get it for you because your ass can't. You don't need food and water, you need enough ATP, vitamins, and minerals to keep you going. I bet there's a theoretical chemical solution to the problem which doesn't require ingestion, and maybe even digestion.
Edited By Malcolm on 1442268999
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
GORDON wrote:Malcolm wrote:GORDON wrote:Ha, you said ATP.
Yup. Ammo and toilet paper.
That was your usage?
I thought you meant the stuff your cells eat. More smarty-pants way of saying "food."
Yeah I meant ... wtf is it? Adenosine triphosphate? The second part was strictly for comedic purpose.
Edited By Malcolm on 1442269752
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
I 'm working my way up to that. Geez. No one has any patience.GORDON wrote:But you don't need that job to survive, you just want it for the extra bennies. You could survive by digging ditches for money which wouldn't require the smart phone.TPRJones wrote:Stranger, would you at least acknowledge that someone with the job of computer programmer "needs" a computer in order to do their job? Or is that also a luxury?
The "smart phone" being the original point of this entire thread, btw.
So I'm gathering that you would say that a computer programmer does not "need" a computer and that a rececar driver does not "need" some sort of automobile? It seems that is what you are saying but I don't want to put word in your mouth.
Everything else has just been youse guys busting my balls.
Some, yes, but not entirely. I still think what you have offered as a definition of needs does not entirely match up with what you have offered as examples of needs.
I've asked a few times for someone to name a place where the environment wouldn't eventually kill you unless you were sheltered, but I haven't gotten one yet.
That word eventually is problematic. Eventually your house can kill you by burning down around your ears. But in general I would say the Afar Triangle and the Ariège region of France are strong candidates because people lived generations in both places before learning to build shelters. Hell there were some cowboys that spent decades living outside in the American West working roaming herds of cattle. Is it comfortable? No. Is it survivable? Yes.
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
Yeah, that's what I'm saying because no one "needs" to do either of those professions.TPRJones wrote:So I'm gathering that you would say that a computer programmer does not "need" a computer and that a rececar driver does not "need" some sort of automobile? It seems that is what you are saying but I don't want to put word in your mouth.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
GORDON wrote:TPRJones wrote:So I'm gathering that you would say that a computer programmer does not "need" a computer and that a rececar driver does not "need" some sort of automobile? It seems that is what you are saying but I don't want to put word in your mouth.
Yeah, that's what I'm saying because no one "needs" to do either of those professions.
I guess want v. need is bullshit because no one needs philosophy or metaphysics which means we don't need ethics and we don't need law or order.
Edited By Malcolm on 1442277676
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Fair enough.GORDON wrote:Yeah, that's what I'm saying because no one "needs" to do either of those professions.
Would you define any particular food item as a need? Is a good steak a need? Is a bowl of rice a need? Is broccoli a need?
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
Depends on context. "Food" is a need, but specific things... it depends. If a steak is all there is to eat, yeah, you need it.TPRJones wrote:Fair enough.GORDON wrote:Yeah, that's what I'm saying because no one "needs" to do either of those professions.
Would you define any particular food item as a need? Is a good steak a need? Is a bowl of rice a need? Is broccoli a need?
I don't think I am being ambiguous or contrary at all, defining my definition of "need." Personally, I am kind of baffled a couple of you are so confused about it.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
GORDON wrote:Depends on context.
I'm going to give that bit a pass because it's slightly confusing in the sense that you've been pretty clear that needs are not relative but rather absolutes, and this runs counter to that. That's more like what Catt and I have been saying. But I digress...
"Food" is a need, but specific things... it depends. If a steak is all there is to eat, yeah, you need it.
Great. So in general no particular food item is a need, it's more that the general concept of food as fuel for the body is a need. I presume the same would be true of shelter and clothing in that no particular shelter or clothing is a need but rather the need is the concept of protection from the elements.
Are there no other conceptual needs? What about mobility; is the ability to move and acquire those needful resources a need? How about information; is sight and hearing a need in so much as they assist in finding those resources?
I promise I'm not being tricky, just fleshing out the boundaries of need versus luxury.
Edited By TPRJones on 1442280520
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"

