WinXP Replacement to require DRM monitors.

Post Reply
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

http://it.slashdot.org/it/05/07/15/155216.shtml?tid=109&tid=172&tid=158&tid=155

I've been using the same 22" monitor since 1998, and I have no plan to replace it until it stops working, not when Windows tells me I need a new one.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
thibodeaux
Posts: 8121
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 7:32 pm

Post by thibodeaux »

WTF?
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

Specifically... as far as I can tell.... it will be content providers (movie, music companies) requiring certain DRM monitors.... but it's still Microsoft writing this "functionality' into the OS.

Seems to be that, for instance, if a AOL/TW movie studio decided it didn't like the SONY company, they could DRM their media up to not do well on a SONY monitor.

Or some such.

There will always be non-DRM media as long as there are smart people, I reckon. Even if owning it will send you to jail.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
mbilderback
Posts: 1282
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 9:50 am
Location: Memphis
Contact:

Post by mbilderback »

I expect this will go over as well as the serializing chips and providing that info to the OS. And look how well that did. It will either A. be dropped as an idea before release, B. be limited in its uses to begin with, or C. come out as planned and be scaled back or eliminated in a quickly released update.

I keep saying I'm going to go pure Linux before each version of Windows is released. Damnit, if software started being sold in Linux versions, I would, but as of yet, I'm stuck with buying Windows only software and with the restrictions of WINE and ANY style emulator, it's just not an option.
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 70451
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Post by Leisher »

Remember when MSN Explorer was the default browser and email program when XP first came out?
"Happy slaves are the worst enemies of freedom." - Marie Von Ebner
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell
thibodeaux
Posts: 8121
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 7:32 pm

Post by thibodeaux »

Yeah but....DRM monitors? WTF?
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

I expect this will go over as well as the serializing chips and providing that info to the OS. And look how well that did. It will either A. be dropped as an idea before release, B. be limited in its uses to begin with, or C. come out as planned and be scaled back or eliminated in a quickly released update.

...

Damnit, if software started being sold in Linux versions, I would, but as of yet, I'm stuck with buying Windows only software and with the restrictions of WINE and ANY style emulator, it's just not an option.
1. When Intel announced that P3 chips would be serialized, I vowed on here that I'd never buy one. I've been AMD ever since, and I'm actually happier for it. Cheaper and just as good.

2. Walmart was (is?) selling super-cheap "Lindows" systems. Like, sub-$200. Too bad too many peeps won't buy a Wal-Mart brand PC. Might make a good, cheap file server, though.................... hmmmmmmmmm........
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Post Reply