Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:06 pm
by TheCatt
My wife likes their early stuff, I prefer the latter.
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:18 pm
by GORDON
I think the later stuff is more polished, while their earlier stuff sounds more garage-bandy, and I don't like the garage band sound.
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:44 pm
by TheCatt
The early stuff, while good, just sounds repetitive to me. The later stuff has more variety, more content.
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 8:05 pm
by WSGrundy
I enjoy them both but the later stuff is better. The early stuff is just fun pop music.
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 1:14 pm
by Leisher
The early stuff made them and was more "pop".
The later stuff was politically fueled and was more..."alternative"?
I'm going to vote early. Reason: No Yoko.
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 1:29 pm
by Malcolm
Leisher wrote:I'm going to vote early. Reason: No Yoko.
That was the one of the key points for me.
Also, early on everyone'd the same problems that'd later develop into a full-blown hissyfit (George's nerves, Paul's drugs, John's insanity, & Ringo's being the worst drummer in fucking history), but in the first half of their careers they just put up w\ it & still cranked out decent tunes. Certainly more pop than interesting, though.
Edited By Malcolm on 1185816572