Here are some articles and an image on the subject.
How it affects gamers.
UK's PM wants to censor everyone's surfing.
What you can do?
The future?

It's a lot easier to build a tower somewhere than it is to run cables to them. And wired will always be >> wireless for speed and price. Look how much wireless data costs. You can pay $80/month for 2-4GB at 5Mbps speeds. My wired connection is $60/month for 50Mbps speeds, with UNLIMITED data. I've used over 150GB some months.TPRJones wrote:If the big companies don't provide reasonable services they will go out of business as people move on to smaller providers that do give them what they want. It's inevitable. Although there may be a year or two of suckage in the meantime.
The FCC will release a proposal soon to reinstate net neutrality rules that would allow broadband providers to negotiate with content providers for preferential treatment, an agency official confirmed Wednesday.
How long until they go full evil, though? How long will the government ignore them? Won't Comcast eventually pay more senators more money and get the FCC siced on Google?TheCatt wrote:On the other hand, shitty rules are an incentive for Google to build out better networks on their own.
I think the latter is more likely than the former. Google isn't evil. Google has made my life better.GORDON wrote:How long until they go full evil, though? How long will the government ignore them? Won't Comcast eventually pay more senators more money and get the FCC siced on Google?TheCatt wrote:On the other hand, shitty rules are an incentive for Google to build out better networks on their own.
http://www.cnet.com/news....esidentGORDON wrote:Money got to the right government people, finally.
By Google, probably not much at all. Government doesn't pay diddly. Now selling your info to advertisers, that's another story.GORDON wrote:... but I do wonder how much of our info is sold and surrendered to the government..
"We can not allow the FCC to implement a pay-for-play system,"