Project

Post Reply
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

Ok...... so when I get the new room done and my command center moved into it, I'd like to set up a functional yet cheap-ass home surveilance system.

I'd like to put 2 or 4 cameras outside the house covering the property, feeding images to my permanent server. I want the server to take a snapshot every 5 seconds or so for archiving purposes. I'd like these cameras to be hard-wired for power, so no battery changing is needed. I have gables but the equipment should probably be weather-proof. I'd like it to be unobtrusive, too. Doesn't need to be invisible, but one shouldn't notice it unless they are looking for it.

CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP. I already have the server, and cabling is cheap and I can run it myself, so the main expense would probably be the cameras, and possibly the software.

Anyone have any ideas?




Edited By GORDON on 1122144599
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 57665
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

How CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP do you want it?
It's not me, it's someone else.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

Under $500? Cheapest possible, really. I'd even buy used equipment. I'd even scavange equipment from a business closing down.

BTW, this isn't out of any type of paranoia... I just think it would be fun/cool/geek thing to do, homegrown-style.




Edited By GORDON on 1122147297
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 57665
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

I had the same thought a few months ago... but it seemed crazy expensive for the cameras once I started looking into it.
It's not me, it's someone else.
User avatar
Cakedaddy
Posts: 9298
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 6:52 pm

Post by Cakedaddy »

X10 cameras? You might have to change batteries. But, I'm betting you could get something from radio shack that would eliminate that. But that means you'll have to run power to them.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

I had the same thought a few months ago... but it seemed crazy expensive for the cameras once I started looking into it.
Hmmm.

Maybe I could just set up the system and do one camera at a time, over time.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 57665
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

When playing with the phone lines I saw where the power meter enters. So I could just branch off that (before the meter) and run it to the cameras. :)
It's not me, it's someone else.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

Heh, that'd be funny.

I could see a LOT of uses for a backdoor energy line. ;-)

Of course there's probably pound-me-in-the-ass prison if you're caught.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 57665
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

Sure... and the fact that it's my employer that I'd be screwing would certainly hurt.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Paul
Posts: 8458
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: KY
Contact:

Post by Paul »

My father-in-law has about half a dozen X10 cameras aroud his house. The one out front moves around.

We also use X10 cameras here at work to see who's coming in the front door.

They work fine. However, if I lived in a crowded neighborhood I'd probably avoid the wireless models, as any neighbor can tune in. I remember seeing an article on Fark a year or so ago about people turning their neighbors in for child abuse because they where tapped into their wireless camera signal and saw the abuse.

I have a some cheap, wired, b&w cameras with night vision (LED's) at my house. We mainly use the one out front to see if anybody is approaching the house, but when my kid was an infant we'd spy on her in her sleep. I got mine of eBay.

You should get at least one camera for the baby's room.




Edited By Paul on 1122302785
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

The X-10's with wires... does that feed power to the camera, too?
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Paul
Posts: 8458
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: KY
Contact:

Post by Paul »

Even the wireless onces have AC input. That's what my father-in-law uses.

The wired cameras I have have three wires, one is for power, one is audio, and one is video (the latter two have RCA connections so they'll plug into a VCR or TV or anything else with an RCA input).

X10 is nice because they provide the software. They have software that'll start recording if movement is sensed, and stop recording once things have stopped moving for awhile.
Paul
Posts: 8458
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: KY
Contact:

Post by Paul »

If I was rich, I'd get the stuff that I saw while Google'ing for webcams.

This Panasonic webcam allows multiple cameras. (I don't know what model it is... but looking around I found other Panasonic cams that do the same thing)

If I was really rich I'd spend more for something like an the Axis server and a good camera.

Of course, I'd have better security to keep people out.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

Are the X-10's good to go out in the weather?
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Vince
Posts: 8624
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: In bed with your mom

Post by Vince »

Are the X-10's good to go out in the weather?
They have weather models, I think. Search their site.

I agree that they're pretty decent for the cost. I picked up 3 of them a few years back for just what your talking about (something cool to play with).
"... and then I was forced to walk the Trail of Tears." - Elizabeth Warren
Paul
Posts: 8458
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: KY
Contact:

Post by Paul »

All of his are outside, on the top of the walls, by the soffits. They overhang of the roof protects them. I don't see any difference between those and the ones we have here at work, so they're probaby not special outdoor cameras (unless we have outdoor cameras here.

The one he has out front is new. It used to a wired one that he got from Radio Shack. It had night vision and an intercom system that let him talk to people.
It died, so he replaced it with a movable X10 with night vision (b&w). He moves it around with a remote. The X10's night vision isn't as good as his old camera was, but he can integrate it into the system.

If it wheren't for the dogs always setting it off, he could set it up to record video whenever movement is detected. Then he can see if anybody approached the house while he was away.




Edited By Paul on 1122388931
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

All of his are outside, on the top of the walls, by the soffits. They overhang of the roof protects them.
We get hurricanes, here. Sometimes it rains up.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Paul
Posts: 8458
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: KY
Contact:

Post by Paul »

We get big freaking storms and tornados and such here.

Here are the cameras. The wired ones appear to be cheaper, at $50-$70 depending on their features.

I'd look around for some sort of coupon or cheap bundle. X10 used to advertise that stuff a lot. You can always add on to any bundle you get.
Vince
Posts: 8624
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: In bed with your mom

Post by Vince »

They always are running various bundled packs. That's what I got way back when. Think it ran me a bit over $200 for 3 or 4 wireless cameras and a remote do-hicky thing-a-ma-bob. Plus the software stuff.
"... and then I was forced to walk the Trail of Tears." - Elizabeth Warren
Post Reply