Motherfuckin', piece of shit, bourgeoise, craptacular, fat ho-fucking, razor dildo-sodomizing, pinko, commie, hippe-ass hunk of steaming hobo droppings.
This is all.
Edited By Malcolm on 1114828201
I hate TCL/TK
Anything Pre-RPG-IV (which includes RPG-400) is olde style. Your columns need to be aligned, etc. RPG-IV and beyond got a little more fre-form and C-like, but it still has an image problem.
If I had to guess I'd guess there's more RPG-3 code out there than there is 4.
If I had to guess I'd guess there's more RPG-3 code out there than there is 4.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Motherfuckers are forcing us to do this.TheCatt wrote:You should join the real world one day: Java/C#
Go to the prof : "How do I do this in TCL/TK?"
Prof : "I dunno."
Asswipes.
Fucked with Swing earlier in the semester. Just reminds me how bad OOP can get in some situations.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
-
thibodeaux
- Posts: 8121
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 7:32 pm
Maybe that's why Duke Nuke'm Forever is taking so long.thibodeaux wrote:GORDON wrote:I'd be curious to hear all y'all's opinion of the RPG language. It's so old that the style is almost like making punched cards on a CRT.
No joke.
There's a role-playing game language?
They should have changed languages too.
It's not me, it's someone else.
If you can't Google it, it's not worth knowing.Malcolm wrote:TheCatt wrote:You should join the real world one day: Java/C#
Motherfuckers are forcing us to do this.
Go to the prof : "How do I do this in TCL/TK?"
Prof : "I dunno."
Asswipes.
Fucked with Swing earlier in the semester. Just reminds me how bad OOP can get in some situations.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Heh, I made a lot of money making those virtual punched cards.Zetleft wrote:GORDON wrote:I'd be curious to hear all y'all's opinion of the RPG language. It's so old that the style is almost like making punched cards on a CRT.
No joke.
Ewww that is an accurate description, now let's never speak of that again.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Well, Bjarne Stroustrup agrees with you, but reality doesnt.Cakedaddy wrote:I think C++ has more long term potential. I don't trust anything that's tied to tightly to MS.
Data from analyst firm Evans Data, which carries out regular developer surveys, appears to contradict Stroustrup's claim that C++ is growing. Evans Data has found that the percentage of developers using C++ has steadily declined over the last six years--from 76 percent in the spring 1998 to 46 percent in fall 2004. But it expects the rate of decline in C++ developers to be "considerably slower" in the next few years.
Janel Garvin, chief executive of Evans Data, said it found that Java use has declined slightly over the last few years. "Java use in North America continually increased until it peaked in 2001 or 2002," Garvin said. "Use has decreased slightly since then across the board, but remains strong."
John Rymer an analyst from Forrester Research said that Stroustrup's estimate of around 3 million C++ developers is "plausible." Forrester Research's latest survey found that C++, Microsoft Visual Basic and Java are used by many companies in their production systems. The survey, which spoke to more than 100 companies, found that C/C++, Visual Basic or Java was used in production systems by 59 percent, 61 percent and 66 percent of companies, respectively.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Imagine that. . . VB is high on the list. . .
VB has come and is on it's way out. C++ is still here. C# will be here as long as MS thinks it will help it make money, then it's replaced. I just trust an open language more than a proprietary one. I'm not going to argue that MS doesn't have market share. I'm arguing that MS will change it's mind again and kill C# one day.
VB has come and is on it's way out. C++ is still here. C# will be here as long as MS thinks it will help it make money, then it's replaced. I just trust an open language more than a proprietary one. I'm not going to argue that MS doesn't have market share. I'm arguing that MS will change it's mind again and kill C# one day.