GORDON wrote:Do you think there are any girls left in the world between the ages of 15 and 21 that have not yet shown up on the internet in some degree of undress?
I think the general rule is, "If you're too dumb to use the timer feature on your camera you're photos are bound to end up on the PC's of thousands of strangers."
TheCatt wrote:Weird, I've never seen that painting before.
Really? It's fairly common. At least, the Ruskies take the bear and photoshop it into a lot of stuff. But the unphotoshopped painting shows up on occasion as well.
GORDON wrote:Do you think there are any girls left in the world between the ages of 15 and 21 that have not yet shown up on the internet in some degree of undress?
Do you think there are any girls left in the world between the ages of 15 and 21 that have not yet shown up on the internet in some degree of undress?
First of all, yes and I'll tell you why. It's because I'm really looking for people I know and thus far I've only found one and she was in an actual porn so I'm not sure she counts.
Second, the bigger question is when will someone think of the children and start banning all nudity on the web. I mean, there's no way to verify ages, so to protect the children, they'll just ban it all.
"Happy slaves are the worst enemies of freedom." - Marie Von Ebner
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell
Do you think there are any girls left in the world between the ages of 15 and 21 that have not yet shown up on the internet in some degree of undress?
First of all, yes and I'll tell you why. It's because I'm really looking for people I know and thus far I've only found one and she was in an actual porn so I'm not sure she counts.
Second, the bigger question is when will someone think of the children and start banning all nudity on the web. I mean, there's no way to verify ages, so to protect the children, they'll just ban it all.
Actually none. I considered Gordo's estimates of age to be a tad incorrect. I'd say the vast majority of the nudity is coming from the 20-30 year old crowd.
I'm wondering if this trend will ever slow down or if it'll pick up steam. Eventually, these girls (and guys) posting stupid shit on the web have to realize that googling a potential employee's name is becoming more and more common. Sure, you don't have a criminal record, but your potential employer didn't care for your nude shots on your blog with comments like "use everything you have to get to the top". Or what if insurance companies start searching the pro-anorexia sites and stop coverage on the girls they find there.
How many employers are going to love Paul's obsession with goatse and furries? Besides Jimmy Kimmell...
"Happy slaves are the worst enemies of freedom." - Marie Von Ebner
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell
This should increase in proportion to the population & inversely proportional to common sense of said population.
Should rise steadily.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Malcolm wrote:This should increase in proportion to the population & inversely proportional to common sense of said population.
Should rise steadily.
Yeah... there's so many of them. 300 million people in the US, let's just assume equally distributed (although clearly tends towards youth) from 0 to 80, that's 2 million females per year... 16-21 means 12 million women in that age range, just in the US.
Yeah, lots of those pics.
Also, remember that cellphone cams, digital cams, etc just get more and more popular/cheaper.