Well, not really, but called a common practice unconstitutional.
I wonder what the cities will do since this directly hits their pocket books?
SCOTUS hammers traffic cops
SCOTUS hammers traffic cops
“Activism is a way for useless people to feel important, even if the consequences of their activism are counterproductive for those they claim to be helping and damaging to the fabric of society as a whole.” - Dr Thomas Sowell
SCOTUS hammers traffic cops
That's an appeals court, not SCOTUS. It could be appealed to SCOTUS, though.
But, like the article says, easy enough to just take pictures instead of chalking.
But, like the article says, easy enough to just take pictures instead of chalking.
It's not me, it's someone else.
SCOTUS hammers traffic cops
Fucking pricks. I didn't notice the headline was different than the link that sent me there.
“Activism is a way for useless people to feel important, even if the consequences of their activism are counterproductive for those they claim to be helping and damaging to the fabric of society as a whole.” - Dr Thomas Sowell