Well, not really, but called a common practice unconstitutional.
I wonder what the cities will do since this directly hits their pocket books?
SCOTUS hammers traffic cops
SCOTUS hammers traffic cops
"Happy slaves are the worst enemies of freedom." - Marie Von Ebner
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell
SCOTUS hammers traffic cops
That's an appeals court, not SCOTUS. It could be appealed to SCOTUS, though.
But, like the article says, easy enough to just take pictures instead of chalking.
But, like the article says, easy enough to just take pictures instead of chalking.
It's not me, it's someone else.
SCOTUS hammers traffic cops
Fucking pricks. I didn't notice the headline was different than the link that sent me there.
"Happy slaves are the worst enemies of freedom." - Marie Von Ebner
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell