2. But they did, and therefore this whole conversation is moot because apparently even the rule makers don't know what a catch is anymore.
Going back to a different story, where I'm the asshole for pointing out a false narrative...
Here's your headline: Eagles-Patriots Super Bowl watched by fewer people
Matches what Gordon posted. People are tuning out. That's the narrative. However...
Understand this number doesn't include a lot of viewers. Particularly those on mobile devices, overseas, watching on delay, watching without cable/Nielsen book, at restaurants, at parties, etc. And just to compare, the last NBA Finals were the most watched in history which amounted to 20.5 million people.The 103.4 million audience is topped by the past eight Super Bowls and the 1983 Finale of M*A*S*H* (106 million viewers).
It also doesn't take into account the fucking boring, cheating ass Patriots in yet another fucking Super Bowl. Viewer fatigue with them is at an all time high. My dad didn't even watch the game as he just assumed the NFL would hand the Patriots a victory.
Anyway, the really interesting fact is buried in the 6th paragraph, which studies have shown most readers don't read:
Like I said, viewership might be down, but we're talking about record highs.The viewership this season marked a 20 percent increase from the last time the two teams played in the Super Bowl (XXXIX, 86 million viewers) in February 2005.