Page 1 of 1

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:49 pm
by GORDON
This looks amusing, in an O Brother, Where Art Thou? sort of way.

<object width="420" height="315"><param name="movie" value="//www.youtube.com/v/1Fg5iWmQjwk?version=3 ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="//www.youtube.com/v/1Fg5iWmQjwk?version=3&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="420" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:00 pm
by TheCatt
Hmmmm... feel like another Life Aquatic

Posted: Sun May 04, 2014 6:00 pm
by TheCatt
The latest Wes Anderson film.

Meh.

Cute, but linear story. Not as much depth to the characters as I hoped for or expected. Not a ton of quirkiness either.

4/10

Tons of famous people. Imaginative, creative, visually interesting, just not stimulating, no real plot. A wonderland tour, that doesn't show as much of the wonderland as you might want.

Posted: Sun May 04, 2014 6:43 pm
by GORDON
merged

Posted: Sun May 04, 2014 6:53 pm
by TheCatt
TheCatt wrote:Hmmmm... feel like another Life Aquatic

I was right. Oh me, where were you last night to remind me?




Edited By TheCatt on 1399244011

Posted: Mon May 05, 2014 7:00 pm
by TheCatt
This. Wes Anderson has become more about his style than about the content. Some NSFW language

<object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="//www.youtube.com/v/aeopJiWnkFI?version=3 ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="//www.youtube.com/v/aeopJiWnkFI?version=3&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>




Edited By TheCatt on 1399330870

Posted: Mon May 05, 2014 8:27 pm
by TPRJones
I just learned that Wes Anderson and Wes Craven are two different people. I had them both lumped together in my head under the label Wes Anderson.

Some comments about various movies suddenly are much less confusing.

Posted: Mon May 05, 2014 8:27 pm
by TheCatt
Buwhwahahahahahahaa

Posted: Mon May 05, 2014 9:12 pm
by Leisher
I think most of Anderson's work is so bad that people assume it's over their head, and they don't want people to think they're stupid, so they say they loved it.

Posted: Mon May 05, 2014 9:29 pm
by TheCatt
Leisher wrote:I think most of Anderson's work is so bad that people assume it's over their head, and they don't want people to think they're stupid, so they say they loved it.
Reading the reviews here certainly made me think that.

I've seen a lot of his movies, and here's my overall:
Bottle rocket - Meh. I just didn't get what other people saw in it. (7.2)
Rushmore - Awesome. Wonderful soundtrack to go with it. (7.8)
The Royal Tenenbaums - Great. Not Rushmore, but close. (7.6)
The Life Aquatic - Abortion. Awful. (7.3)
The Darjeeling Limited - Very good, entertaining. (7.2)
Moonrise Kingdom - Very, very good. Not quite Rushmore/RT good, but well worth watching. (7.8)
The Grand Budapest Hotel - Not quite as bad as the Life Aquatic, but not good. (8.4)

So I've seen every movie he's done, except the Fantastic Mr Fox. I watched the first few minutes of that and decided I didn't want to see it.

Imdb scores added in parentheses.

Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 12:25 am
by TPRJones
So far I've liked Moonrise Kingdom and the Fantastic Mr Fox. The rest have been meh.

Haven't seen the newest one yet.

Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 12:37 am
by GORDON
Stop talking about this and start talking about the recent game of thrones ep

Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 12:42 am
by TPRJones
Haven't watched it yet. Maybe tomorrow.



Edited By TPRJones on 1399351343