Page 1 of 2
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 1:19 pm
by Malcolm
Invites the whites. I don't know about anyone else, but race has zero to do with my disdain for his movies, plays, and books.
And, lest they needed further incentive, "there are white people (Amy Smart, Eddie Cibrian, Ryan Eggold) in the movie," Perry reminded the audience.
It's not the race of your cast members, either, dude.
Edited By Malcolm on 1394817641
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 1:26 pm
by Leisher
I quite enjoyed House of Payne on TBS.
That being said, I think most of his work is shit. The spin off to House of Payne was terrible, his acting as Alex Cross was laughable, and as soon as I see "Madea" anywhere near something he's made I zone it out.
Some people need to accept that race (or whatever card they want to play) isn't "the factor" into why their project doesn't become more popular. More often than not, it's a lack of talent or creativity.
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 2:58 pm
by Troy
His work is horrible and it's on broadcast stations in ATL all the damn time.
Or maybe it's just not made for me. Either way i'd rather watch a re-run on PBS about Yellowstone 9 times out of 10.
Edited By Troy on 1394823541
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:05 pm
by GORDON
Troy wrote:His work is horrible.
Or maybe it's just not made for me. Either way i'd rather watch a re-run on PBS about Yellowstone 9 times out of 10.
yep
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:09 pm
by TheCatt
On that 10th time you'd be passed out and wouldn't notice?
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:20 pm
by GORDON
No, 10th time just turn it all off and surf porn.
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:27 pm
by TheCatt
GORDON wrote:No, 10th time just turn it all off and surf porn.
I'm concerned that that wasn't like option #2
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:32 pm
by GORDON
Yellowstone is pretty awesome.
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:52 pm
by Troy
We use our TV for the radio channels more than the broadcast content. So the other 1 time I'm changing it to whatever channel 105.7 is on.
Edited By Troy on 1394826751
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:58 pm
by Leisher
GORDON wrote:Yellowstone is pretty awesome.
It's not more awesome than girl on girl.
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 4:23 pm
by Vince
And if one or more of the girls are squirters, it's like the best of both worlds.
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 4:24 pm
by GORDON
Not a fan of squirting.
Girl on girl IN Yellowstone would... be... like... wow.
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 4:39 pm
by Vince
GORDON wrote:Not a fan of squirting.
commie
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 5:10 pm
by GORDON
looks like pee
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 5:15 pm
by Vince
And vaginas look like an ax wound. So?
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 5:54 pm
by GORDON
NOT going to get into a discussion of the merits of pee 
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 5:56 pm
by Troy
Siding with Gordon on this one and the less said the better.
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 8:22 pm
by TPRJones
Would girl on girl with squirting in Yellowstone be good?
Now that I think about it, I don't know why that doesn't already exist. "Young Faithful: Squirting Hourly" or some such.
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 8:36 pm
by TheCatt
I'd watch that.
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 8:38 am
by thibodeaux
TPRJones wrote:Now that I think about it, I don't know why that doesn't already exist. "Young Faithful: Squirting Hourly" or some such.
Rule 34