Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 10:09 am
Article.
Which trilogy is worse, this or the Star Wars prequels?
Which trilogy is worse, this or the Star Wars prequels?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 10:59 am
According to IMDB, Human Centipede at least had nudity, so I'm going with Star Wars being worse.
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:23 am
I think that nudity would have to be classified as scat, so no thanks. I never expected to have to say this, but I'll take Jar Jar over scat any day. Although it's still a tough decision.
Edited By TPRJones on 1330964658
Edited By TPRJones on 1330964658
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:26 am
Well, I still think HC is better, as I've never seen it, whereas the prequels are a memory I can still never forget.
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:13 pm
The nudity in HC.... nice boobs, but they are on a girl who has had her lips and front teeth removed and her facial orifice sewn to a dude's ass that has been peeled like a grape. And some other chick has had the same thing done to the middle chick's ass.
I wouldn't call it titillating.
Best thing about the movie was that they get sewn together half way through, and the 2 girls can no longer speak. The doctor was smart that way.
I wouldn't call it titillating.
Best thing about the movie was that they get sewn together half way through, and the 2 girls can no longer speak. The doctor was smart that way.
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:17 pm
Man, no dialogue also would have helped the preqeuls.
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:18 pm
I love the thought of Lucas stumbling upon this threat and seething with anger. 