Page 1 of 1

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 12:37 am
by GORDON
I'm about 33% of the way through this book.... but already, holy shit.

Premise seems to be about how the human genome is getting patented one gene at a time, which basically renders our tissues as... not ours.

I haven't gotten into the meat of the plot yet, but here's one of the many strings of plotline that are currently there, but heretofore disconjunct with every other thread of the story:

In the book the UCLA bio department realizes a cancer patient produces an abnormally high amount of some cancer-fighting factor... so they continue taking tissue from him every 6 months for years after his cancer is gone... and they don't tell him they've made $3 billion, with a B, by selling his tissues to pharmaceutical companies.

The guy finds out, and takes UCLA to court.

The judge rules that there is a patent owned by UCLA, and the dude received UCLA's help in fighting cancer, so he has no right to his tissues, nor to the money they have made by selling his tissues. Furthermore, and here's the scary part, it is UCLA, a state school... his tissues were declared property of the state, so they got to continue harvesting his tissues, against his will, under eminent domain.

Is this where we're heading?

I'll write more once I finish the book.

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:53 am
by TheCatt
You cannot patent naturally occurring items. So, no, we're not headed this way.

I did a quick Google and some people have filed for patents, and there are some that are genome-related, but I couldn't find anything like Crichton's story.

Although, you can't patent obvious things as well, but that sure as heck hasn't stopped all those computery patents.

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:19 am
by GORDON
That is mentioned in the book... basically, the courts aren't keeping up with technology, and the pharmaceutical companies can afford lots of lawyers.

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:09 am
by thibodeaux
He's got some similar rants about this on his website.

Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 7:07 pm
by GORDON
The book ends up being about the dude mentioned above... his cells were deemed property of UCLA, and when the company that had licensed the cells R&D lost all existing cell lines, their lawyers decided that anywhere his cells existed, they belonged to that company. Including the cells in his daughter and grandson. Even if they didn't want to give them up.

Seemed a bit far fetched to me, not even considering his daughter wouldn't have exact versions of his cells. Hell, the only cell he contributed to his daughter's creation was only half a copy.

Sorta scary, but we'd really need to devolve into the "corporations run america" society that the lefties say we already live in for it to be believable.

Or you just need to really hate and mistrust lawyers.




Edited By GORDON on 1190934536