Page 1 of 2
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 2:19 pm
by Malcolm
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:22 pm
by TheCatt
Such a disappointing link.
I can already feel Thib's pain.
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 5:14 pm
by Malcolm
Hey, I made the title "Japanese great tits" instead of "great Japanese tits." It's as clear as day.
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:25 pm
by TPRJones
I read it as Japans Greatest Tits.
Also disappointed.
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:37 pm
by Malcolm
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:47 pm
by Troy
Didn't click on this all day. All for nothing.
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 12:40 am
by Leisher
I'm contemplating a ban for this offense. Fucking bullshit.
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:20 am
by TheCatt
Malcolm owes us now.
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 10:22 am
by Malcolm
My magnanimous and munificent presence isn't enough?
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 11:34 am
by TheCatt
Malcolm wrote:My magnanimous and munificent presence isn't enough?
Unless you have some fantastic Japanese boobs, no.
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 5:39 pm
by Malcolm
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 6:23 pm
by TheCatt
That's a start.
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 6:50 pm
by Malcolm
TheCatt wrote:That's a start.
Whatever, I think that's decent trade off ... or do blueballs turn all married guys into unreasonable rage-aholics?
I bet you clicked on them all. It's densely packed.
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 7:18 pm
by TheCatt
Malcolm wrote:TheCatt wrote:That's a start.
Whatever, I think that's decent trade off ... or do blueballs turn all married guys into unreasonable rage-aholics?
I bet you clicked on them all. It's densely packed.
Ah, I use a plugin that show an image when I hover, and so I just saw one image, thinking it was one link.
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 10:42 am
by Leisher
TheCatt wrote:Malcolm wrote:TheCatt wrote:That's a start.
Whatever, I think that's decent trade off ... or do blueballs turn all married guys into unreasonable rage-aholics?
I bet you clicked on them all. It's densely packed.
Ah, I use a plugin that show an image when I hover, and so I just saw one image, thinking it was one link.
Ditto.
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 11:32 am
by Malcolm
You kids and your damn shortcuts. Back in my day, we had to do all our own clicks.
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 3:23 pm
by Alhazad
Lest you thought you could please everyone, I'm disappointed that a thread about scientific discovery has taken a turn toward the lowest-common denominator.
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 5:16 pm
by TPRJones
There was nothing "lowest" about those denominators. Hubba hubba, etc.
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 5:31 pm
by TheCatt
TPRJones wrote:There was nothing "lowest" about those denominators. Hubba hubba, etc.
AWwwwwww yeah/!
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 6:44 pm
by Alhazad
TPRJones wrote:There was nothing "lowest" about those denominators. Hubba hubba, etc.
No, but they were very common.