Page 1 of 2

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 2:19 pm
by Malcolm

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:22 pm
by TheCatt
Such a disappointing link.

I can already feel Thib's pain.

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 5:14 pm
by Malcolm
Hey, I made the title "Japanese great tits" instead of "great Japanese tits." It's as clear as day.

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:25 pm
by TPRJones
I read it as Japans Greatest Tits.

Also disappointed.

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:37 pm
by Malcolm
Image

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:47 pm
by Troy
Didn't click on this all day. All for nothing.

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 12:40 am
by Leisher
I'm contemplating a ban for this offense. Fucking bullshit.

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:20 am
by TheCatt
Malcolm owes us now.

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 10:22 am
by Malcolm
My magnanimous and munificent presence isn't enough?

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 11:34 am
by TheCatt
Malcolm wrote:My magnanimous and munificent presence isn't enough?
Unless you have some fantastic Japanese boobs, no.

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 5:39 pm
by Malcolm
Grea[url=http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Yy_LzmS3iP0/V ... nikmat-Sex
-Foto-Telanjang-Japan-Porn-xxx-HD-dilarang-haram%2B(78).jpg]t[/url]http://asiansexiestgirls.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Japanese-doll-with-perfect-boobs-1.jpgJapan[url=http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-HHeY-Yus2ag/V ... nikmat-Sex
-Foto-Telanjang-Japan-Porn-xxx-HD-dilarang-haram%2B(170).jpg]e[/url]s[url=http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ZUDB2oVlv5k/V ... nikmat-Sex
-Foto-Telanjang-Japan-Porn-xxx-HD-dilarang-haram%2B(86).jpg]e[/url]http://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/e9/1f/72/e91f72bfd07bb0cb714cce92d14e1ac3.jpgt[url=http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-XqooB7-iPgE/V ... nikmat-Sex
-Foto-Telanjang-Japan-Porn-xxx-HD-dilarang-haram%2B(171).jpg]i[/url]ts. It may or may not be exactly what you think.

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 6:23 pm
by TheCatt
That's a start.

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 6:50 pm
by Malcolm
TheCatt wrote:That's a start.

Whatever, I think that's decent trade off ... or do blueballs turn all married guys into unreasonable rage-aholics?

I bet you clicked on them all. It's densely packed.

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2016 7:18 pm
by TheCatt
Malcolm wrote:
TheCatt wrote:That's a start.
Whatever, I think that's decent trade off ... or do blueballs turn all married guys into unreasonable rage-aholics?

I bet you clicked on them all. It's densely packed.
Ah, I use a plugin that show an image when I hover, and so I just saw one image, thinking it was one link.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 10:42 am
by Leisher
TheCatt wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
TheCatt wrote:That's a start.
Whatever, I think that's decent trade off ... or do blueballs turn all married guys into unreasonable rage-aholics?

I bet you clicked on them all. It's densely packed.
Ah, I use a plugin that show an image when I hover, and so I just saw one image, thinking it was one link.
Ditto.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 11:32 am
by Malcolm
You kids and your damn shortcuts. Back in my day, we had to do all our own clicks.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 3:23 pm
by Alhazad
Lest you thought you could please everyone, I'm disappointed that a thread about scientific discovery has taken a turn toward the lowest-common denominator.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 5:16 pm
by TPRJones
There was nothing "lowest" about those denominators. Hubba hubba, etc.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 5:31 pm
by TheCatt
TPRJones wrote:There was nothing "lowest" about those denominators. Hubba hubba, etc.
AWwwwwww yeah/!

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 6:44 pm
by Alhazad
TPRJones wrote:There was nothing "lowest" about those denominators. Hubba hubba, etc.
No, but they were very common.