Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:05 pm
People in an uproar over a "give blood or go to jail" program for offenders who can't pay.
I'm confused by the outrage.
Uh...how does going to jail benefit someone? Doesn't NOT going to jail benefit them? Isn't this a phenomenal get out of jail free card? What happens if those folks or ones they love need blood, doesn't it then benefit them? Doesn't it benefit them to help their community? Isn't "protecting the public health" exactly what they're doing?
I get that the procedure is "invasive", but not too many people die from giving blood and I'd think a trip to the pokey is worse than 20 minutes donating blood.
I'm confused by the outrage.
“What happened is wrong in about 3,000 ways,” said Arthur Caplan, a professor of medical ethics at NYU Langone Medical Center, part of New York University. “You’re basically sentencing someone to an invasive procedure that doesn’t benefit them and isn’t protecting the public health.”
Uh...how does going to jail benefit someone? Doesn't NOT going to jail benefit them? Isn't this a phenomenal get out of jail free card? What happens if those folks or ones they love need blood, doesn't it then benefit them? Doesn't it benefit them to help their community? Isn't "protecting the public health" exactly what they're doing?
I get that the procedure is "invasive", but not too many people die from giving blood and I'd think a trip to the pokey is worse than 20 minutes donating blood.