Page 1 of 2
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 1:04 pm
by Leisher
So the two 12 year old girls who tried to murder another 12 year old girl are blaming Slender Man.
Peeps, as you would expect, are freaking out. News programs are warning parents about Slender Man. Clearly we need to ban Slender Man for the children...
Hey dumbfucks, how about the fact that these two girls are fucking insane, and probably have shitty parents?
Plus, they're terrible murderers. They were trying to "prove themselves to Slender Man". I'd say they failed considering one held the victim down while the other stabbed her 19 times, and the victim lived.
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 1:11 pm
by Malcolm
Wisconsin is a boring place. People need to make up wacky shit to pass the time.
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 1:17 pm
by Paul
In the old days they just said that the devil made them do it.
No company to complain to then.
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 1:31 pm
by TPRJones
Clearly it was a witch.
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 1:35 pm
by Vince
There was a recent episode of Supernatural that must have been inspired by the Slenderman meme.
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 2:48 pm
by Malcolm
More.
"People that trust you are very gullible," Geyser told a detective. They passed by a public bathroom and some trees, and then, "Stabby, stab, stab," Geyser said.
On Tuesday, Creepypasta's administrators posted a 3,800 word statement in which they expressed their condolences but said the site is not to blame.
"If we could truly blame any violent crimes solely on one specific form of entertainment as the trigger – well, I suppose it would be a relief," they wrote, "as we'd be able to expunge said cause and clear the world of such awful happenings."
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 1:26 pm
by Malcolm
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 2:25 pm
by Leisher
The mother said her daughter has mental health issues
Case closed.
I don't remember who I was talking to about this subject, I think it was my co-worker lunch crew, but the point was made that they used to lock up the crazy people. Now they don't because "it's better for them".
Considering you have to be insane to think Slender Man is real AND want to serve him, not to mention the mental status of all the shooters in recent mass shootings, perhaps we need to re-think this "it's better for them" policy.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 2:27 pm
by Malcolm
Now they don't because "it's better for them".
Not being locked up is generally easier for the mentally disturbed. It tends to make the lives of everyone around them worse. Additionally, these kids allegedly have some authority figure involved in their lives dropping the ball.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 9:44 pm
by Vince
Leisher wrote:I don't remember who I was talking to about this subject, I think it was my co-worker lunch crew, but the point was made that they used to lock up the crazy people. Now they don't because "it's better for them".
I think it was an ACLU case some years back that released them all. "If they aren't a threat to themselves or others..." blah, blah, blah. But they aren't a threat to themselves or others until they are, then it's too late and they want to ban guns and stuff.
Edited By Vince on 1402364674
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 10:24 pm
by Malcolm
Crazy will always be among us. The people who believe that they can reshape the world so that "this will NEVER happen again" prevent rational actions from being taken.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 10:35 pm
by GORDON
Yeah but if guns are completely removed from existence, there can never be another mass killing by crazy people and/or right wingers.
When you believe something like that, which many do, you can never be swayed.
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2014 5:41 am
by Vince
GORDON wrote:Yeah but if guns are completely removed from existence, there can never be another mass killing by crazy people and/or right wingers.
I always point those people towards the drug trade. That's illegal, and they are still out there. They can even get them into prisons which is one of the most controlled environments there is. At least in theory.
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2014 8:39 am
by TPRJones
That goes both ways, of course. People that will argue how useless it is to outlaw guns seem to be unable to comprehend that the same logic applies to drugs.
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2014 10:24 am
by Malcolm
Vince wrote:GORDON wrote:Yeah but if guns are completely removed from existence, there can never be another mass killing by crazy people and/or right wingers.
I always point those people towards the drug trade. That's illegal, and they are still out there. They can even get them into prisons which is one of the most controlled environments there is. At least in theory.
A shining testament to the ability of the black market.
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2014 10:42 am
by GORDON
If we give the government enough power, they would be able to squash the black market, and therefore we can truly rid the world of evil guns.
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2014 2:22 pm
by Vince
TPRJones wrote:That goes both ways, of course. People that will argue how useless it is to outlaw guns seem to be unable to comprehend that the same logic applies to drugs.
Hey, I'm all for legalizing drugs as soon as I don't have to pay for worthless junkie pukes food because they can't get up off the bathroom floor.
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2014 2:27 pm
by Malcolm
Vince wrote:TPRJones wrote:That goes both ways, of course. People that will argue how useless it is to outlaw guns seem to be unable to comprehend that the same logic applies to drugs.
Hey, I'm all for legalizing drugs as soon as I don't have to pay for worthless junkie pukes food because they can't get up off the bathroom floor.
Health care is nationalized. You are paying for it anyway.
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2014 3:22 pm
by GORDON
Malcolm wrote:Vince wrote:TPRJones wrote:That goes both ways, of course. People that will argue how useless it is to outlaw guns seem to be unable to comprehend that the same logic applies to drugs.
Hey, I'm all for legalizing drugs as soon as I don't have to pay for worthless junkie pukes food because they can't get up off the bathroom floor.
Health care is nationalized. You are paying for it anyway.
And as far as I am concerned, that means he paid for the right to have an opinion about it. TPR disagrees, I think.
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2014 5:20 pm
by TPRJones
Not necessarily. But if his ideas are rooted in the idea that 1) something illegal can be stopped, and 2) making something illegal won't stop it, then that's a bit inconsistent.