Page 1 of 1
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:21 pm
by Leisher
in the nude...
Obviously, that link isn't safe for work. The pictures are interesting, but why nudity was needed...I'm not sure. It's appreciated though!!
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:28 pm
by TheCatt
When is nudity not needed?
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:49 pm
by Malcolm
TheCatt wrote:When is nudity not needed?
Any movie scene with Kathy Bates.
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 2:19 pm
by GORDON
Art is art, but I really hate gimmicky bullshit like that.
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:26 pm
by TPRJones
I like it.
Truth be told, I'm not a huge fan of most porn. I would prefer if porn were just like any other good movie with a nice script and good acting and special effects and a story, except the actresses (and actors, I guess) happened to be attractive and naked. This feels kind of like that, just everyday activities but she's nude for it.
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:53 pm
by GORDON
When I am analyzing art I always think, "Did it take any skill to make this?" That is one of my little internal criteria for what makes good art. In this case, I think the answer is no.
It's also why I don't care for punk music. 
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:11 pm
by TheCatt
DK RULEZ
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 9:39 am
by Leisher
Truth be told, I'm not a huge fan of most porn. I would prefer if porn were just like any other good movie with a nice script and good acting and special effects and a story, except the actresses (and actors, I guess) happened to be attractive and naked. This feels kind of like that, just everyday activities but she's nude for it.
So you prefer reality porn where everyone pretends they're all amateurs, and no scene ever breaks down into cheesy music and porn dialogue?
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:44 am
by TheCatt
Like TPR, I'd prefer something more "real" as well. It's hard to find erotic movies that have plot, that then don't go all artistic - Whereby I mean "ugly people" or "stupid depressing story"