Page 1 of 1

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:02 pm
by GORDON
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner....k-steyn
Stage One: The strange compulsion to assure us that the killer is a “right wing conservative extremist . . . ."

. . .

Stage Two: Okay, he may be called Mohammed but he’s a “lone wolf.”

. . .

Stage Three: Okay, even if there are enough lone wolves around to form their own Radio City Rockette line, it’s still nothing to do with Islam.

. . .

Stage Four: The backlash that never happens. Because apparently the really bad thing about actual dead Jews is that it might lead to dead non-Jews: “French Muslims Fear Backlash After Shooting.” Likewise, after Major Hasan’s mountain of dead infidels, “Shooting Raises Fears For Muslims In US Army.” Likewise, after the London Tube slaughter, “British Muslims Fear Repercussions After Tomorrow’s Train Bombing.” Oh, no, wait, that’s a parody, though it’s hard to tell.

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:32 pm
by thibodeaux
Maybe we should add this to our list:
When a white heterosexual male does something to a non-WHM, it's a hate crime
When a non-WHM does something to a WHM, it's....what?

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:27 pm
by Cakedaddy
It's racist if it gets any coverage which specifies the race of the criminal and victim. As in, if you specify, you are racist.



Edited By Cakedaddy on 1332624446

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 12:24 am
by TPRJones
I can imagine some times when the race of either the criminal or the victim (or both) are relevant to the story. But when they get featured for no good reason, then yes: racist.