Page 1 of 1

Articles without comments

Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 8:35 am
by Leisher
FB mom shames son after sexist post.

I bit on the bait, and saw how one sided the article was and how the son's meme could easily be argued as fact, yet for some reason, there's no comment section. Doesn't that immediately negate the credibility of your site? If you can't allow people to offer a differing opinion or simply point out flaws in your argument, aren't you automatically in the wrong even if you're right?

For the record, the kid's meme is one sided too, but not completely off base.

Re: Articles without comments

Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 8:44 am
by TheCatt
Comment sections are the cesspools of the internet. I feel dumber every time I read them.

Re: Articles without comments

Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 12:27 pm
by TPRJones
It would be accurate if it said something like "what it takes for a man to be attractive to women" and "what it takes for a woman to be attractive to men". Women go through a whole lot of crap to pretty themselves up, but that's to impress each other. Most men could give two shits about that stuff as long as she's not fat.

Re: Articles without comments

Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 12:48 pm
by TheCatt
Maxim did a spread on some supersize model. All I could think was "do not want."

Then I saw that same person on the front of SI's swimsuit edition. Nope.

Re: Articles without comments

Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 1:01 pm
by Leisher
What's offensive about the plus sized models is that I'm told I'm wrong for not being attracted to them.

Re: Articles without comments

Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 2:04 pm
by TheCatt
Leisher wrote:What's offensive about the plus sized models is that I'm told I'm wrong for not being attracted to them.
Agreed.

Re: Articles without comments

Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 2:52 pm
by GORDON
Leisher wrote:What's offensive about the plus sized models is that I'm told I'm wrong for not being attracted to them.
And don't even get started on how interracial porn is now problematic and inherently racist.

Re: Articles without comments

Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 4:39 pm
by TPRJones
I would think that non-interracial porn would be the type that is racist, since it implies that the races should not mix.

Re: Articles without comments

Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 4:56 pm
by Alhazad
TPRJones wrote:I would think that non-interracial porn would be the type that is racist, since it implies that the races should not mix.
I don't know what GORDON means, but a lot of interracial is couched in terms of dominance and "<race1> girls recognizing that <race2> cock is superior" now, rather than just mutual attraction or casual sex. Could be referring to that?

Re: Articles without comments

Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 5:00 pm
by GORDON
Now I'm trying to remember the article I read... something about porn "White women who crave black dicks!" or something like that was racist, as were personal ads that say stuff like, "Sorry no black guys."

Because they don't want to have their purse stolen!

/Tosh joke

Re: Articles without comments

Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 5:17 pm
by Malcolm
"Sorry no black guys."
Fuck forbid one partially bases one's dates on looks.