Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 10:46 am
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 10:48 am
Heh, that article gives it two different names. I have been hearing, "A Dame to Kill For."
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 10:52 am
"A Dame to Kill For" sounds more noir, so that probably will be it.
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 11:05 am
I'm almost 100% that that was the name of the graphic novel.Leisher wrote:"A Dame to Kill For" sounds more noir, so that probably will be it.
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 7:36 pm
Trailer. Delivers so far.
<object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="//www.youtube.com/v/RIFqHn_Ul0M?version=3 ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="//www.youtube.com/v/RIFqHn_Ul0M?version=3&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
<object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="//www.youtube.com/v/RIFqHn_Ul0M?version=3 ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="//www.youtube.com/v/RIFqHn_Ul0M?version=3&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
Posted: Thu May 22, 2014 1:25 pm
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 3:51 pm
This poster has the MPAA's panties in a bunch. 
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 4:09 pm
Deadline reports the MPAA's disapproval (which is not uncommon) was “for nudity — curve of under breast and dark nipple/areola circle visible through sheer gown.”
I've been examining this picture (for science). I see the curve of under breast. But I don't see the dark nipple/areola visible through sheer gown.
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 7:19 pm
I fucking LOVE science.
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:13 am
TheCatt wrote:I've been examining this picture (for science). I see the curve of under breast. But I don't see the dark nipple/areola visible through sheer gown.
Her tits are as smooth and nippleless as a Barbie doll.
I think what they are referring to is the area on her right breast where the shadow from her arm meets the outer curve and almost looks like a round photo-shopped removal of a nipple. But they're just looking for an excuse.
Edited By TPRJones on 1401718451
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:28 am
Go to 55 seconds in:
<object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="//www.youtube.com/v/a9AkO6L8W3A?hl=en_US& ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="//www.youtube.com/v/a9AkO6L8W3A?hl=en_US&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
"And these guys are really looking."
<object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="//www.youtube.com/v/a9AkO6L8W3A?hl=en_US& ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="//www.youtube.com/v/a9AkO6L8W3A?hl=en_US&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
"And these guys are really looking."
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:13 pm
<object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="//www.youtube.com/v/jDW3r-yIKHU?hl=en_US& ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="//www.youtube.com/v/jDW3r-yIKHU?hl=en_US&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2014 1:20 pm
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:25 pm
Umm. I saw it. And I liked about 45 minutes of it.
Someone watch it and tell me what the point of the JGL scenes are though.
Someone watch it and tell me what the point of the JGL scenes are though.
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2015 8:28 pm
Finally DVR'd this. Omfg, what a hodgepodge of decent stories fucked up by staccato tangential plots. Let's get to the first casting problem:
Dennis Haysbert as Manute. Whoever thought that was a good idea should be fired. I kept waiting for him to say, "You know, with all these things being destroyed and people being killed, I think it's time I told you about All-State." I couldn't buy him as a goon, it was like watching a tall, black Gregory Peck trying to be threatening. I also don't get how this is a sequel but he has both eyes to begin with.
JGL: Yeah, I didn't care for this vignette, either.
Christopher Meloni didn't need to be in the movie, at all, and neither did Bruce Willis. I didn't recognize Lady Gaga whatsoever. On the other hand, the Marv-Ava-Dwight thing is easily the best thread. It took me a scene or two to figure that Clive got recast. Also, since Marv apparently kills people just for fun on his downtime with little encouragement, why the fuck doesn't he go into biz and straight up offer those services?
Edited By Malcolm on 1450661317
Dennis Haysbert as Manute. Whoever thought that was a good idea should be fired. I kept waiting for him to say, "You know, with all these things being destroyed and people being killed, I think it's time I told you about All-State." I couldn't buy him as a goon, it was like watching a tall, black Gregory Peck trying to be threatening. I also don't get how this is a sequel but he has both eyes to begin with.
JGL: Yeah, I didn't care for this vignette, either.
Christopher Meloni didn't need to be in the movie, at all, and neither did Bruce Willis. I didn't recognize Lady Gaga whatsoever. On the other hand, the Marv-Ava-Dwight thing is easily the best thread. It took me a scene or two to figure that Clive got recast. Also, since Marv apparently kills people just for fun on his downtime with little encouragement, why the fuck doesn't he go into biz and straight up offer those services?
Edited By Malcolm on 1450661317
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 2:57 pm
I also don't get how this is a sequel but he has both eyes to begin with.
I suppose the Dwight-Marv-Ava sequence is meant to happen before the first film, so that makes this one both a sequel and prequel.