Page 35 of 46

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 6:10 pm
by Vince
I'd noted elsewhere that no Republican since Roe v Wade has won without a majority Catholic vote. That trend held this time with Trump getting a +7 among Catholics. This surprised me because I figured the pro immigration stance that Catholics usually hold would hurt Trump. Apparently Obama's suing nuns hurt Hillary more.

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 9:46 am
by Leisher
Image

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 11:01 am
by GORDON
Having given the family drama a day to soak in, it suddenly occurred to me this morning that the main offenders are now two broken, cranky old women. The other day I still had the mindset I've had since I was a little boy, that they were grownups and I was young and should respect them... and now I realize that just like with my dementia riddled MIL, I should just be nodding and smiling and saying "bless their hearts." It took this moment to really see myself as one of the adults in this family, and not one of the kids... old habits... and really the thoughts and words of crazy people don't have an affect on me. They are spewing "bigots and racists!" just like the old people in the 80s and 90s had to be continually reminded to stop calling them the "coloreds."

As for the younger women everywhere huddling down and "I now have to explain to my daughter how what he does is not ok," and being deathly afraid of rape all of a sudden.... well, there's less of an excuse, unless you want to say they have PTSD from 8 years of liberals controlling the media and government, telling you what to be afraid of. Then, again, they are to be pitied.

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 11:42 am
by TheCatt

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 8:54 pm
by GORDON
Is this accurate? Seems too on-the-nose.
15037269_1172257476156461_6554908932858654517_n.jpg

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 9:02 pm
by Malcolm
GORDON wrote:Is this accurate? Seems too on-the-nose.
15037269_1172257476156461_6554908932858654517_n.jpg
You mean crime is more likely to be occur and reported in urban areas where more people live? The hell you say.

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 9:40 pm
by TheCatt
Rate implies per capita... though no explicitly stated since no scale

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 10:04 pm
by Malcolm
TheCatt wrote:Rate implies per capita... though no explicitly stated since no scale
There are a few things about the map comparison which reek of bullshit:

1) There are some huge crime hotspots where there's no blue.

2)Alaska's missing. Its rate is off the fucking scale.
From 2014...
Alaska has a high crime rate figure of 635.8 per 100, 000 population. It is followed by Nevada which has 635.6 per 100, 000 population. These states are followed by Tennessee and New Mexico as well as Florida
So one wonders how the east coast is getting lit up along while ... just fuck it. Here are numbers:
1 Alaska 635.8
2 Nevada 635.6
3 Tennessee 608.4
4 New Mexico 597.4
5 Florida 540.5
6 Louisiana 514.7
7 South Carolina 497.7
8 Delaware 489.1
9 Arkansas 480.1
10 Maryland 446.1
11 Missouri 442.9
12 Alabama 427.4
13 Michigan 427.3
14 Oklahoma 406.0
15 Texas 405.9
16 Arizona 399.9
17 California 396.1
18 Massachussets 391.4
19 New York 381.8
20 Georgia 377.3
21 Illinois 370.0
22 Indiana 365.3
23 Kansas 348.6
24 North Carolina 329.5
25 South Dakota 326.5
26 Montana 323.7
27 Pennsylvania 314.1
28 Colorado 309.1
29 West Virginia 302.0
30 Wisconsin 290.3
31 Washington 285.2
32 Ohio 284.9
33 Nebraska 280.4
34 Mississippi 278.5
35 Iowa 273.5
36 North Dakota 265.1
37 New Jersey 261.2
38 Hawaii 259.2
39 Connecticut 236.9
40 Oregon 232.3
41 Minnesota 229.1
42 Rhode Island 219.2
43 Utah 215.6
44 Idaho 212.2
45 Kentucky 211.6
46 Virginia 196.2
47 New Hampshire 196.1
48 Wyoming 195.5
49 Maine 127.8
50 Vermont 99.3
3) So something's fucked about that map unless there's been a drastic shift in the last two years. Let's pick a random state, Utah, with a crime rate of 215.6. Yeah, it's 43rd, but it should still register a blip more than the states below it. Except Virginia has a shitload more red and even Idaho warrants a dot. Minnesota and Oregon should have near parity. Yet, check out the hotspot in the former that's not in the later. Texas and Oklahoma are nearly equal, but there's nowhere near as many hotspots in OK as TX. I could take the dots from TX and blanket cover OK. Arizona comes in at 399.9, NM at 597.4. Yet who looks worse from the crime rate map? Ari-fucking-zona. SD should have a NC number of hotspots. I could go on, but it appears to be bullshit.

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 10:15 pm
by TPRJones
It looks like it's likely not per capita but total incidents. Besides the words "Crime Rate" are clearly not part of the original but added on by whoever meme'd it up so they aren't indicative.

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 10:23 pm
by Malcolm
Less bullshitty map. Interactive, too.

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 5:11 am
by Vince
A couple of stats to throw out in response to the question of whether the GOP still needs their traditional base.

Trump won with fewer actual votes than McCain or Romney lost with. The black voter was massively MIA compared to 2008 and 2012. I wonder if BLM, while intended for the last year to be a GOTV vehicle ended up hurting the Democrats. Democrats want their base angry at Republicans. BLM just made them angry at anyone not black and they ran a white woman.

Another stat which had me thinking this thing would tip in Hillary's favor was the enthusiasm gap. About a week prior to election day, 54% of Hilary voters said they were voting for Hilary. Only 42% of Trump voters said they were voting for Trump (as opposed to against the other candidate). This is almost always a bad thing for a candidate. Except in this case the dislike/distrust of Hillary was extreme enough to matter, apparently.

So unless Democrats keep running Hillary or other vile white people, I think the GOP should hold off a minute on jettisoning their base voters.

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 5:40 pm
by GORDON
Another realization today:

Many have been saying for years that the system is rigged and broken and there's no fix for it but to wipe it clean and start over, to "Let it burn."

Opponents of this idea think that outlook is wrong and "deplorable" and just bad overall.

But now after the election, look who is rioting and signing petitions to Burn it All Down.... the very people who always said the concept was wrong.

It made me realize that I always knew it would be the so-called liberals trying to start the fires.

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 7:53 pm
by Vince
GORDON wrote:Another realization today:

Many have been saying for years that the system is rigged and broken and there's no fix for it but to wipe it clean and start over, to "Let it burn."

Opponents of this idea think that outlook is wrong and "deplorable" and just bad overall.

But now after the election, look who is rioting and signing petitions to Burn it All Down.... the very people who always said the concept was wrong.

It made me realize that I always knew it would be the so-called liberals trying to start the fires.
I don't want to burn it all down either. Not until the people that say they want to burn it all down can tell me what they want to replace it with.

But more to your point, this election cycle has convinced me there isn't a dimes worth of difference in 90% of the left and the right. After spending a decade in the 90's railing about how character matters, the right made every argument to defend Trump that the left did to defend Clinton. And the left suddenly decided that character suddenly matters except they will pretend that Hillary was married to some other guy apparently. Not to mention her own character flaws. I feel like Davey Crockett telling congress "to hell with you all, I'm going to Texas". If there were an equivalent today.

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 8:07 pm
by GORDON
If only Texas would actually succeed... I know I'd move there.

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 11:38 pm
by Malcolm
GORDON wrote:If only Texas would actually succeed... I know I'd move there.
Secede?

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 11:53 pm
by GORDON
Both.

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 12:18 am
by Malcolm
GORDON wrote:Both.
To quote buddy holly and jean-luc Picard, "That'll be the day."

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:51 pm
by GORDON
So have any of your friends or/and family crossed any lines in their meltdowns? I now have 2 aunts that I'll probably never speak to again.

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 5:45 pm
by Malcolm
GORDON wrote:So have any of your friends or/and family crossed any lines in their meltdowns? I now have 2 aunts that I'll probably never speak to again.
If I did that, then I wouldn't be talking to anyone I know except 3P supporters and non-voters. On one hand, I have the smugger than all motherfucking shit Drumpfers who called me "pro-Hillary" several times when I explained why I wouldn't vote for their walking orange asshole of a candidate that makes me long for the days of rule by tyrant in Athens. On the other hand, I have the near maniacal Hillary toadies that accuse me of functionally contributing to the rise of Dipshit Donnie Douchebag because I couldn't bring myself to vote for the Alien Queen.

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 5:54 pm
by TheCatt
GORDON wrote:So have any of your friends or/and family crossed any lines in their meltdowns? I now have 2 aunts that I'll probably never speak to again.
No. but then, i'm an independent, and so's my wife.