NCAA
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 2:03 pm
That's been the defense so far. Which totally explains his large laminated sheets of the opposing teams' signals that he's holding on the sidelines...TheCatt wrote: Mon Nov 20, 2023 2:51 pm The coaches can always say "we thought he decided the signals using normal means"
I don't either, but apparently being just an analyst he's not supposed to be doing it.TheCatt wrote: Mon Nov 20, 2023 2:51 pm I don't know why him signal ing players is an NCAA violation? Is it because he decided a signal in real time, or that only certain coaches can signals players or something.?
Leisher wrote: Sun Apr 30, 2023 5:08 pm FYI, this is the same Deion Sanders who said he'd put HBCU schools on the map and make people pay attention to them only to leave for Colorado and take all the players he recruited with him.

Thanks.Leisher wrote: Sat Nov 25, 2023 7:00 pm Congrats Cake.
That was a good game. We made the mistakes and you guys didn't. You deserved that win.
The game was fair enough. Could OSU change "all" of their signs based on when the scandal broke? No. However, I do think they could change them all from when they had their suspicions going back to last year. Did they? We'll never know. However, I didn't see anything in this game that gave me pause. I think it was legit as it gets.Cakedaddy wrote: Sun Nov 26, 2023 12:20 am So, what are thoughts on the fairness of the game? Are we still gaining advantage from signs that were stolen? Having the head coach missing even things out at all? Partridge being gone?
That TD, which decided the game, is going to be a forever controversy. First of all, it was an insanely lucky throw. JJ makes it through those two defenders one out of ten tries. Secondly, anywhere else in the field of play it's an INT. Third, the call on the field being a TD meant it was likely staying that way. Had they called INT on the field, I would bet you anything it would have stayed an INT. Fourth, the real controversy is did your WR ever have possession. By rule? No. The ball was moving the whole time and take out the defender and just say he drops it, no TD.Cakedaddy wrote: Sun Nov 26, 2023 12:20 am After we were able to keep that touchdown, I said "I guess they aren't having the refs punish us".
As for Day and McCord...Cakedaddy wrote: Sun Nov 26, 2023 12:20 am I feel bad (only a very tiny bit) for Day and your QB. They are really good. But I get it. They just can't lose this game.
Zero. I would love it and would honestly feel pretty confident about beating you in a rematch at a neutral site. However, I don't think there's any chance it happens.
This is also a very logical and fair viewpoint.TheCatt wrote: Sun Nov 26, 2023 11:36 am Everything UofM has done since the cheating started is tainted. Butterfly flapped its wings, and it changed recruiting and everything else since.