Welcome to Thunderdome

Leisher wrote: I want the variety.

Translation: pre-ops, and farm animals.

Leisher wrote:Do I want to open the same awesome present 30 Christmases in a row or do I want to open 30 different pretty cool presents 30 Christmases in a row?

I want the variety.

Forget the 8's. How low would you go? 7? 6? 4? That's where it gets interesting.

A 10 with a good personality is a very rare thing, but 30-days in a row could very easily get monotonous. I like banana splits but wouldn't want be forced to eat a big one every day. After a couple weeks I'd be dreading that banana split.
Variety is nice and less monotonous, but the less attractive the woman the less desirable that scenario is.
I was interested in determining the over/under beauty score for the 30 women where they would equal the 30-days-in-a-row with the 10. Is it better to have a random type of cracker (Saltine, Ritz, Triscuit, Goldfish) every day than a banana split? Probably not. But a random cookie? Yeah.

I'd go with thirty 6's over one 10 for thirty days. Thirty 5's... I don't know. A 6 is going have some aspect of cuteness, and a 5 is plain. But even a plain woman is going to bring different/unique things to the table to help break make the 30 days different and (hopefully) exciting. But after being drained for a couple weeks it'd be harder to be attracted to a plain looking person.

Paul wrote:But after being drained for a couple weeks it'd be harder to be attracted to a plain looking person.

This is pretty salient. The more you get off, the higher your standards are going to go. By the last day you could be looking at a 7 and thinking, "Why am I spending time on this pig?"

Alhazad wrote:

Paul wrote:But after being drained for a couple weeks it'd be harder to be attracted to a plain looking person.

This is pretty salient. The more you get off, the higher your standards are going to go. By the last day you could be looking at a 7 and thinking, "Why am I spending time on this pig?"

Yep. And after awhile that 10 is going to be less and less appealing.

I'd go as low as 7.5... .maaaayyyybeee 7.25.

I'll take the variety over the perfect 10. I'll go all the way down to 5's, although I'd prefer a random mix of all numbers from 4 to 10 in that set of 30 instead of all being the same level. Variety in the variety if you will.

I have standards.

The worst part of this challenge for me would be the women without personality no matter what they look like.

I'd rather screw a 6 with passion than a 10 that I have to check for a pulse.

By the way, if your rating has a 7 as someone that isn't attractive, your rating scale is broken. A 5 is average. An average, plain jane, girl. Completely fuckable, but not a head turner. Certainly not a Mama June.

"I like to talk after. Otherwise we are just dogs."

Leisher wrote:The worst part of this challenge for me would be the women without personality no matter what they look like.

I'd rather screw a 6 with passion than a 10 that I have to check for a pulse.

By the way, if your rating has a 7 as someone that isn't attractive, your rating scale is broken. A 5 is average. An average, plain jane, girl. Completely fuckable, but not a head turner. Certainly not a Mama June.

I wouldn't fuck a 5. I would fuck a 7, but not 30 of them. And there'd have to be conditions... like I was drunk or something.

"I like to talk after. Otherwise we are just dogs."

What is "Things Gordon has never said to a woman in real life?"

And if she's not talking during, she's not great in bed.

I wouldn't fuck a 5. I would fuck a 7, but not 30 of them. And there'd have to be conditions... like I was drunk or something.

Your scale is fucked.

In Catt's scale...

10


7


I'm thinking if you ask Catt to count to 10, he starts at 7.

First girl gets an 8.4.

2nd gets a 2.0

I grade on a bell-curve, as mentioned before... and have higher standards for who I would sleep with.

Well, let's make this fun.

Post a picture of a 10. (Wives and girlfriends don't count. - That stipulation is put here to protect them and you.)

You get zero points for the obvious joke instead of posting photos of hot women.

Leisher wrote:In Catt's scale...

10

Ugh, what's with those stick arms? Lift a weight, honey.

A 10 based on looks alone? That's going to require a shitload of mental contortion.

Personally I'm into short and nerdy, preferably with dark hair and nice ... assets. Top of that list would be Trisha Hershberger:





[media]http://img.ifcdn.com/images/f5a2a5b4bec ... 619_1.webm[/media]

TheCatt wrote:First girl gets an 8.4.

2nd gets a 2.0

I grade on a bell-curve, as mentioned before... and have higher standards for who I would sleep with.

The second one is a zero you sick fuck