Page 16 of 20

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 1:43 pm
by Vince
Suddenly the media is concerned about cybersecurity concerning Hillary's emails. Go figure.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 8:35 am
by Vince
I see the historic significance of first woman nominee, but I don't understand how those who say a man can become a woman think it matters now.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:19 am
by Leisher
The MSM is making sure you know the WikiLeaks releases of the DNC emails is intentionally meant to harm Clinton.

Weird how they never said shit about Michael Moore's "documentary" released during Bush's second bid.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:24 am
by TPRJones
I see the historic significance of first woman nominee, but I don't understand how those who say a man can become a woman think it matters now.
Because no one says a man can become a woman. A trans person isn't becoming, they always were. Transitioning isn't about changing, it's about finally being able to express what was always true. At least that's the general idea.

Personally I think that's a bit restrictive as it doesn't allow for the concept of gender fluidity.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:44 am
by Vince
For better or worse, I saw two things in the DNC convention that were devastating to Trump. The segment with the handicapped girl and the lead up video with Trump mocking the handicapped reporter and the gold star Muslim parents carrying their own pocket Constitution. Just from a marketing perspective, those angles were well produced.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 1:12 pm
by Malcolm
The dad of the dead Muslim army vet destroyed Trump and resonated in the way the Benghazi mom didn't.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 8:32 am
by Vince
Malcolm wrote:The dad of the dead Muslim army vet destroyed Trump and resonated in the way the Benghazi mom didn't.
Actually, the Benghazi mom was really effective as well. However, preempting her with your largest audience on Fox News by calling in to O'Reilly's show was stupid. And it was effective in pointing out how the media treats the two parties. Benghazi mom speaking = exploitive. Muslim parents speaking = moving.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 9:26 pm
by Leisher
Vince wrote:
Malcolm wrote:And it was effective in pointing out how the media treats the two parties. Benghazi mom speaking = exploitive. Muslim parents speaking = moving.
Truth.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 9:31 pm
by Leisher
Hillary's campaign hacked again.

The MSM is implying it's the Russians. I'm wondering if it's actually just a PR move to gain her sympathy and link Trump to Russia.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 11:19 pm
by GORDON
If fake the emails will be about, "Hey did hillary personally give all that money to orphans? we told her it wasn't safe but she just doesn't listen."

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2016 12:39 am
by Leisher
Here comes the next scandal.

In other news, Assange says they have more on her campaign.

A blowhard with no plan vs the most corrupt politician in history (and that's saying something).

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 10:21 am
by Vince
Pretty much the definition of "Bad optics"

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 1:10 pm
by Leisher
Vince wrote:Pretty much the definition of "Bad optics"
That's not news or relevant. It's only relevant when something like that happens to a Republican. That's when it becomes, "He was hand selected!", "Trump supports terrorism", and blah blah blah.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 4:34 pm
by Vince
To his credit, Trump decided to take advantage of this opportunity by suggesting that 2nd amendment people assassinate someone or something. I don't even know what he was trying to say here, but it seemed ill advised.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 5:16 pm
by Malcolm
Hillary wants to essentially abolish the 2nd amendment.
Keep smoking, Donnie.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 5:31 pm
by Troy
JFC Trump, mostly I think what he says is just hot air and dumb shit.

HOWEVER, essentially telling his supporters with guns to "take care" of your opponent in the event she wins and has contrary views, is another thing entirely. Pretty un-american, uncivilized and mostly ridiculous. November cannot get here soon enough.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 6:02 pm
by Malcolm
Just under 3 months to go. That's all kinds of days for Donnie Dipshit to out-dumbass himself. The debates could be epic.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 7:19 pm
by Malcolm
Clinton University.
The bulk of Laureate's revenues come from their international schools - the company has about 800,000 students in more than 70 schools in 30 countries. Walden University is the company's flagship school in the United States.
...
The federal student loan program has been good to Walden University. According to several studies, Walden students carry some of the highest student loan debts in the country. A 2015 Brookings Institution study found that by 2014 Walden students had accumulated $9.8 billion in debt, second only to the University of Phoenix. A 2015 study by the Center for American Progress found that Walden students received the most federal graduate loans in the 2013-2014 academic year, with over $756 million. The 2012 Senate investigation found that over 70 percent of the school's revenue came from federal financial aid programs.
Must be nice to get subsidized kickbacks for people who have a nontrivial chance of being unable to pay you back.
According to third-party research, the average student loan amount for graduate students at Walden is comparable to the graduate students who attended non-profit universities.
As if that's something to be proud of. The idea behind for-profit knowledge is that the public system is so fucked, bloated, and expensive that a lean, mean, capitalist machine can do twice the work for half the cost.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 8:46 pm
by TPRJones
Malcolm wrote:As if that's something to be proud of. The idea behind for-profit knowledge is that the public system is so fucked, bloated, and expensive that a lean, mean, capitalist machine can do twice the work for half the cost.
Nice in theory, but in any segment of the market where government has a hand there can be no real competitive capitalism, there can only be cheaters looking for ways to cheat money out of the system. And there's a whole hell of a lot of government in the education sector.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:40 am
by Leisher
Dems are very worried the Repubs will use hacked memos.

I love that they're trying to say if the Republicans use these, the Russians win.