Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2015 11:43 pm
Posting from the couch, went down with the ship
E: helluva vague sniper post
Edited By Troy on 1425012239
E: helluva vague sniper post
Edited By Troy on 1425012239
Page 2 of 3
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2015 11:44 pm
Honeymoon's over.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2015 11:46 pm
When I opened the original pic up in mspaint to try to invert it I also did color sampling. There was black that was not a very dark black and blue. There was no white or gold anywhere in that dress according to mspaint.GORDON wrote:I straight up color sampled in paintshop. There was no black in it. There were some light shades of blue in one of the pics. Someone color adjusted the pictures.
If what you say is true, this just makes it more confusing.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2015 11:48 pm
I only sampled the pic that looked brighter to me, so there are at least 2 floating around. Even that one said the "white" was a light blue, but the gold was, at darkest, a light brown.
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 9:14 am
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 9:18 am
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 9:26 am
Here comes the science.
That's a good article with pictures of it in different scales, and they show the Photoshop stuff Gordo did.
I still see light blue/brownish gold on the original picture.
That's a good article with pictures of it in different scales, and they show the Photoshop stuff Gordo did.
I still see light blue/brownish gold on the original picture.
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 9:29 am
xkcd
Still can only see blue and black here.
Celebrities
Ah! When I opened this link there was a momentary flash where my brain said white and gold. But then it instantly said, no, that's wrong, it's just because of the blue colored images on either side that you saw that, it is clearly blue and black. EDIT: The image attached to the article has been changed, so the above does not apply to the image now shown there.
At least now I can understand where it comes from, though ... sort of. I still can't imagine how you would see it that way unless it was surrounded by tons of dark blue.
Edited By TPRJones on 1425061821
Still can only see blue and black here.
Celebrities
Ah! When I opened this link there was a momentary flash where my brain said white and gold. But then it instantly said, no, that's wrong, it's just because of the blue colored images on either side that you saw that, it is clearly blue and black. EDIT: The image attached to the article has been changed, so the above does not apply to the image now shown there.
At least now I can understand where it comes from, though ... sort of. I still can't imagine how you would see it that way unless it was surrounded by tons of dark blue.
Edited By TPRJones on 1425061821
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 9:34 am
The thing is, in the pictures at the top where it says "white-balanced as if the dress is white-gold" I still only can see what looks like a badly desaturated and brightened picture of a dress that is clearly blue and black.Leisher wrote:Here comes the science.
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 9:56 am
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 10:15 am
This article has 3 pics of the dress, and each one looks different colors to me, so obvious photo manip has been done, somewhere. I was color sampling the white/gold one, but I can also see the black/blue in the other pic and I am sure color sampling would have seen black/blue in that one.Leisher wrote:Here comes the science.
That's a good article with pictures of it in different scales, and they show the Photoshop stuff Gordo did.
I still see light blue/brownish gold on the original picture.
Still weird that 2 people together would look at the same pic and see different colors though.
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 10:26 am
This article has 3 pics of the dress, and each one looks different colors to me, so obvious photo manip has been done, somewhere.
You didn't read the article. They did manipulate the photos to show what others were seeing and why.
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 10:28 am
I was seeing 2 different versions yesterday, though, just not the blatant blue and black.
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 11:38 am
I'm speechless.Troy wrote:Posting from the couch, went down with the ship
E: helluva vague sniper post
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 12:01 pm
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 1:44 pm
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 2:35 pm
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 5:57 pm
This was my experience as well. But then again I mess with light saturated pictures from my trail cams all the time when the sun's pointing into them the wrong way and have kind of learned to recognize that and filter it out.TPRJones wrote:The thing is, in the pictures at the top where it says "white-balanced as if the dress is white-gold" I still only can see what looks like a badly desaturated and brightened picture of a dress that is clearly blue and black.Leisher wrote:Here comes the science.
Do you do a lot of photography? Or some measure of photography other than stuff you've pulled off the Internet?
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 7:35 pm
Wife: "I just saw a picture with really poor white balance and lighting"
She's a photographer.
Edited By TheCatt on 1425083740
She's a photographer.
Edited By TheCatt on 1425083740
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 10:09 pm
Do you do a lot of photography?
Nope. But I did watch a lot of scrambled porn when I was young. Maybe that helped.