Page 2 of 4
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:33 pm
by Leisher
Murray out.
The date on this article is a day earlier than the last one Gordo posted, but it references Ramis' comments.
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:58 pm
by Malcolm
Going ahead without him?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:31 pm
by Malcolm
Zombies back from the grave.
Nonetheless, for fans of the franchise, looks like GHOSTBUSTERS 3 is oh, so very close to that elusive greenlight. I’m sure once they do in fact greenlight it, Dan Aykroyd can stop shilling vodka and get back to what he does best: Talking about Ghostbusters 3.
Hah.
Edited By Malcolm on 1384457608
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:44 pm
by TheCatt
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:01 pm
by Malcolm
Bonus if he comes back as a ghost in the movie.
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:05 pm
by Leisher
That sucks.
Think Akroyd will still push on with Ghostbusters 3 despite one of his partners being dead and the other refusing to do it?
Does The Blues Brothers 2000 ring a bell?
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:15 pm
by Malcolm
Think Akroyd will still push on with Ghostbusters 3 despite one of his partners being dead and the other refusing to do it?
All four original cast members could die or refuse to go along with things. Just write them into the new script as ghosts. You only needs the rights to make a new movie. Do you think keeping Danny out of the creative process is going to make a better or worse movie? Wtf has he done in the past couple decades that's been good?
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:34 pm
by TPRJones
Malcolm wrote:Wtf has he done in the past couple decades that's been good?
Grosse Pointe Blank
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:37 pm
by Malcolm
TPRJones wrote:Malcolm wrote:Wtf has he done in the past couple decades that's been good?
Grosse Pointe Blank
You'll notice he wasn't a producer, writer, or director.
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 11:10 am
by GORDON
1. Great way to break the news on this forum.
2.
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 11:53 am
by Leisher
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 1:23 pm
by Leisher
Ghostbusters 3 thrown for a loop?
Long story short: They can't find a director. I would wager that Akroyd's strong arming of this movie, and Murray being out are good reasons directors are passing. However, they've now offered the job to Paul Feig with the caveat that he can rewrite the entire script.
I think less Akroyd calling the shots is a good thing. Plus, if McCarthy is brought in and can get Murray to come on, all the better.
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 1:34 pm
by Malcolm
They can't find a director.
I'll go on the record and offer my services.
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:56 pm
by TheCatt
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 11:48 pm
by Malcolm
Please, sweet jeebus, tell me that's not for real.
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 11:44 pm
by Leisher
So the all female Ghostbusters is a go.
Well, guess what? [url=http://deadline.com/2015/03/ghostbusters-channing-tatum-joe-and-anthony-russo-drew-pearce-ivan-reitman-dan-aykroyd-120
1388917/]So is a competing all male Ghostbusters.[/url]
|
Awesome! Two movies nobody was asking for!!!
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 11:54 pm
by Malcolm
Jonah Hill should be following on his coattails in a couple months.
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 11:59 pm
by GORDON
Malcolm wrote:
Jonah Hill should be following on his coattails in a couple months.
He's America's sweetheart.
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2015 9:55 am
by Leisher
Spoilers about a scene in the female Ghostbusters movie.
Essentially, Akroyd has a cameo, the joke is dumb, and based on his role apparently this is a reboot.
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2015 10:23 am
by Malcolm
That killed the only reason I had to give a fuck about that movie.