Welcome to Thunderdome

Alhazad wrote:

TheCatt wrote:I've been pondering this more. If the question were about having a threesome with my wife... I may actually lower my standards for said 3rd person. At this point it's purely a hypothetical though. Hmmm.

Surely it would be more genteel to let her pick, so you get a guy that matches her taste.

I've been pretty clear that 2 men 1 woman is off the table.

TheCatt wrote:

Alhazad wrote:

TheCatt wrote:I've been pondering this more. If the question were about having a threesome with my wife... I may actually lower my standards for said 3rd person. At this point it's purely a hypothetical though. Hmmm.

Surely it would be more genteel to let her pick, so you get a guy that matches her taste.

I've been pretty clear that 2 men 1 woman is off the table.

Obviously. You don't want to break your table and have to buy a new one.

Paul wrote:This guy evidently picked the 30.

Boat full of Nope. The one in the bottom right gets a maybe, hard to tell from the camera angle.

There are at least a few there, blonde dreadlock chick in the lower right leading the way. That's dead sober. 6-8 beers, that field's wide open.

Malcolm wrote:There are at least a few there, blonde dreadlock chick in the lower right leading the way. That's dead sober. 6-8 beers, that field's wide open.

Possibly the best post you've ever written.

As for that picture, the only automatic "NOs", even if I've been drinking, is the guy and the red head in the front row next to him. That chick is not attractive at all. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't sleep with the short haired brunette in the front row to the redhead's right either. I'd let her blow me though.

The rest all have some level of attractiveness that would demand a sexual act. Although, I could absolutely see booze and how close to closing time it is being factors for some.

Leisher wrote:I'd let her blow me though.

There you go. There are many more women I'd let blow me, than stick my penis in their vag.

Although even that has limits.

So stop asking if you can blow me Gordon, the answer will always be no.

More like the answer is mmmph mph mmmph because you are blowing me already

As if someone couldn't still speak clearly with you in their mouth...

There are many more women I'd let blow me, than stick my penis in their vag.

Giving a proper blow job takes skill. Vaginal intercourse takes far less.

Malcolm wrote:

There are many more women I'd let blow me, than stick my penis in their vag.

Giving a proper blow job takes skill. Vaginal intercourse takes far less.

True, but there's no baby risk in her mouth, and lower disease risk too.

Malcolm wrote:

There are many more women I'd let blow me, than stick my penis in their vag.

Giving a proper blow job takes skill. Vaginal intercourse takes far less.

"Making a man climax is easy. Insert somewhere wet, thrust, repeat." - Dante

Leisher wrote:

Malcolm wrote:

There are many more women I'd let blow me, than stick my penis in their vag.

Giving a proper blow job takes skill. Vaginal intercourse takes far less.

"Making a man climax is easy. Insert somewhere wet, thrust, repeat." - Dante

Obviously Dante only fucked vaginas with teeth and didn't know the difference.

Malcolm wrote:

Leisher wrote:

Malcolm wrote: Giving a proper blow job takes skill. Vaginal intercourse takes far less.

"Making a man climax is easy. Insert somewhere wet, thrust, repeat." - Dante

Obviously Dante only fucked vaginas with teeth and didn't know the difference.

The basis of the statement is 100% factual.

Imagine every woman's vagina could be removed like Katya's. Could all make the typical man cum used in exactly the same motion at exactly the same speed? Yes.

Throw in everything else around the vagina and you start seeing things that can both stop or accelerate the process.

Leisher wrote:Imagine every woman's vagina could be removed like Katya's.

Wait, what?

Katya

Hah! I forgot about the time Lana found it.

Leisher wrote:

Malcolm wrote:

There are many more women I'd let blow me, than stick my penis in their vag.

Giving a proper blow job takes skill. Vaginal intercourse takes far less.

"Making a man climax is easy. Insert somewhere wet, thrust, repeat." - Dante

Let me know what it's like fucking a fat guy's armpit after he plays twenty games of ping-pong.

Malcolm wrote:

Leisher wrote:

Malcolm wrote: Giving a proper blow job takes skill. Vaginal intercourse takes far less.

"Making a man climax is easy. Insert somewhere wet, thrust, repeat." - Dante

Let me know what it's like fucking a fat guy's armpit after he plays twenty games of ping-pong.

All that hair would be painful.

And while you're trying to come up with an example of something so gross it makes your point, while completely avoiding the scenario I laid out, you're actually proving Dante's statement as factual. I've seen porns where dicks end up in armpits. Glory holes weren't invented because women like to stick their private parts into any hole in search of pleasure...

I thought of a funny scenario, but you'll just ignore it, go the "I'm the manliest of men" route, or claim to be a superstar cocksman.

I've seen porns where dicks end up in armpits.

Yes, because someone is theoretically paying to see it. That person (the viewer) is also not the one fucking the armpit. Let's take a quick survey of some hookers and see how many get that request.

Glory holes weren't invented because women like to stick their private parts into any hole in search of pleasure...

Those were invented the same reason AshleyMadison.com was. Desperation. I wouldn't describe either as "wet."