Page 6 of 6
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 4:15 pm
by GORDON
Malcolm wrote:This is kinda/sorta in that ballpark.
They are tenuously related. Like how poker and "go fish" are related because they use the same playing cards.
It's a stretch, but still, in my opinion, a violation.
I don't feel strongly enough about it to go to war over it, though. She still wouldn't have any nudie pics to leak if she had never created any nudie pics.
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 4:38 pm
by TPRJones
Malcolm wrote:Sorry, not just downloaded. Looked at.
Same thing. You see, when you open a web browser and look at a picture on the internet, your computer has to contact the other computer (etc etc).
Unless there were printouts, I guess. Then there would be a difference. But who would be doing that?
Edited By TPRJones on 1416865179
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:17 pm
by Malcolm
Whoa. Let's flag down a cab and head for Real Street. The original source of these photos is her. Why did she feel the need to take these? Her alibi:
She claims she made the photos because she was in a long distance relationship and her boyfriend would either look at porn or look at you.
1) If you have problems with your man looking at porn, the world has you fucking outgunned. *rimshot*
2) That claim is more than a little condescending towards men and it demonstrates she doesn't understand them whatsoever.
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:22 pm
by GORDON
Malcolm wrote:2) That claim is more than a little condescending towards men and it demonstrates she doesn't understand them whatsoever.
When obviously he is going to look at her AND porn.
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:38 pm
by Malcolm
GORDON wrote:Malcolm wrote:2) That claim is more than a little condescending towards men and it demonstrates she doesn't understand them whatsoever.
When obviously he is going to look at her AND porn.
Bingo.
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:49 pm
by GORDON
I will give her slack for that, too. She's pretty young, and I have no idea what her dating experience has been like.... but I have known women older than her who were clueless about men.
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:53 pm
by Malcolm
GORDON wrote:I will give her slack for that, too. She's pretty young, and I have no idea what her dating experience has been like.... but I have known women older than her who were clueless about men.
I can even understand her being clueless. It doesn't change the fact that what she said was idiotic.
I guess she also comprehends technology about as well as she comprehends men.
Edited By Malcolm on 1416869639
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:54 pm
by GORDON
All in all, I will allow her to be sometimes dumb and emotional and female without holding it against her.
I'll hold THIS against her though, yanowutimsayin.
Edited By GORDON on 1416869716
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:12 pm
by Leisher
To me her statement was almost as much of a turn off as Elle MacPherson's Tonight Show interview. (There's a pull from the past.)
I give her slack for being young, which means she's ignorant about how the world works. Still, i hope she's mature enough to realize that EVERYONE she dates in the future has already seen those pictures and there's nothing she can do about it.
If she's smart she can use it to eliminate the liars:
"Did you see those pictures of me?"
"No."
"Show yourself out liar."
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2015 8:13 pm
by GORDON
Here's the first trailer for the last movie.
http://nerdist.com/watch-t....-part-2
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 7:45 pm
by GORDON
This movie was faithful to the book, and as such was not the rollicking funfest the first couple movies about gladiatorial combat with children have been. It wrapped up the story but it isn't something you would play on mute during a party, too much of a downer.
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 7:54 pm
by GORDON
Also check out how there's a scene where a guy gets his legs blown off and there's no blood. PG-13, yo.
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:09 pm
by Malcolm
Is it filled with scenes of Katpiss bitching about the gender pay inequality among multimillionaires or giving interviews about how she can't get a date?
Edited By Malcolm on 1448241072
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:17 pm
by GORDON
Malcolm wrote:Is it filled with scenes of Katpiss bitching about the gender pay inequality among multimillionaires or giving interviews about how she can't get a date?
No but there's an amusing scene with combatants blending in with refugees.
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:29 pm
by Leisher
GORDON wrote:This movie was faithful to the book, and as such was not the rollicking funfest the first couple movies about gladiatorial combat with children have been. It wrapped up the story but it isn't something you would play on mute during a party, too much of a downer.
Easily the most positive review I've seen for this film.
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 4:35 pm
by GORDON
Prequels.
http://nerdist.com/the-hunger-games-will-live-on-in-prequel-movies/
I think the first Games, Haymitch's games, or the rise of President Snow, have potential to be good movies. Even the Revolution that started it all, maybe.
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 5:10 pm
by Malcolm
Goddamnit. Fuck that entire series.
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:26 pm
by Leisher
Yeah, this is shit news.