Bad week for the internet.
This is what happens when old, bribed motherfuckers get the power to make laws about shit that didn't exist before they became old, bribed motherfuckers.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
SCOTUS: Price fixing by manufacturers is now legal.
It'll be a short term problem at worst, overall. Many retailers just won't carry anything with a fixed price. Some big retailers still will, but not enough to make it worth it for the manufacturer to do the fixing in the long run. The more stubborn manufacturers will end up losing significant market share before long.
FTC rejects net neutrality.
I think this one is good news. Sure, it'll be annoying as hell in the short run, but any inequality that has been identified will eventually be overcome by the market. This may be just the push needed to finally get the move to fat pipe wireless node networks going. Can't charge for a backbone when the internet goes democratic and everyone with a wireless router becomes a tiny piece of backbone unto themselves.
Sure, the tech is not quite there yet but it's very very close. All it really needs is market incentive, which hasn't been there as long as the backbones have been artificially price-reduced.
----
I guess my bottom line is that I like it when companies and governments try to screw with the internet. Because in the end the power always vests in the people, and the internet is one arena where they will always eventually win. I'm hoping that eventually The Man will learn the lesson that more freedom is inevitable, and maybe take that lesson offline and stop trying to screw with our Real Lives so much.
Edited By TPRJones on 1183082214
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
History & I believe such a thing to be highly improbable, nigh impossible.TPRJones wrote:I'm hoping that eventually The Man will learn the lesson that more freedom is inevitable, and maybe take that lesson offline and stop trying to screw with our Real Lives so much.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
I don't know about where you live, but here there's one dominant pipe, Road Runner. DSL is here, but it sux0rs. As long as most consumers don't have much choice in carrier, then the carriers have market power, and will be able to enforce that power upon others.TPRJones wrote:I think this one is good news. Sure, it'll be annoying as hell in the short run, but any inequality that has been identified will eventually be overcome by the market. This may be just the push needed to finally get the move to fat pipe wireless node networks going. Can't charge for a backbone when the internet goes democratic and everyone with a wireless router becomes a tiny piece of backbone unto themselves.
Eventually, it's possible we'll all have multiple capable providers and that market power will diminish. Until then, we're susceptible to the whims of the same people who think we don't want ala carte cable.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Eventually, it's possible we'll all have multiple capable providers and that market power will diminish. Until then, we're susceptible to the whims of the same people who think we don't want ala carte cable.
I'm talking about when you no longer need a carrier, because each wireless router is talking to every other in a distributed network, and there is no need to be plugged directly into anything to have service. It's already being done to a limited extent in some parts of Europe, and the new OLPC program includes nodular networking.
It's not all that far away. The new long-range wireless standards (2 mi. range) that are on the very near horizon make it practical for most people. And it gets closer to becoming reality if the current backbone providers start causing problems and push the market into finding alternate solutions.
Edited By TPRJones on 1183128353
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
The days of persistent, non-commercial mesh networks are far into the future. If ever.TPRJones wrote:I'm talking about when you no longer need a carrier, because each wireless router is talking to every other in a distributed network, and there is no need to be plugged directly into anything to have service. It's already being done to a limited extent in some parts of Europe, and the new OLPC program includes nodular networking.Eventually, it's possible we'll all have multiple capable providers and that market power will diminish. Until then, we're susceptible to the whims of the same people who think we don't want ala carte cable.
It's not all that far away. The new long-range wireless standards (2 mi. range) that are on the very near horizon make it practical for most people. And it gets closer to becoming reality if the current backbone providers start causing problems and push the market into finding alternate solutions.
It's not me, it's someone else.
TheCatt wrote:The days of persistent, non-commercial mesh networks are far into the future. If ever.
They'll be rolling out a non-persistent version in rural Africa later this year with the OLPCs. It's a good start.
If the current Neutrality crises passes without anything changing, I'd predict mesh networks to become common within 25 years. If the Neutrality crises goes poorly and providers start seriously screwing with everyone, then it'll be more like 5 years, 10 at the outside.
Edited By TPRJones on 1183135653
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
Shitty-ass Winblows has dominated the OS market for years now. The only thing that's remotely got a chance to make a dent is some form of very user friendly Linux. Even if that existed (no, it doesn't), I wouldn't relish the idea of going toe-to-toe w\ the big boys (or in this case, just Macroshaft).
Toppling several top level shitty-ass ISPs is even harder.
Toppling several top level shitty-ass ISPs is even harder.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
-
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:58 pm
What, just because it's hard to say Ubuntu that makes it an unfriendly linux?Malcolm wrote:The only thing that's remotely got a chance to make a dent is some form of very user friendly Linux. Even if that existed (no, it doesn't), I wouldn't relish the idea of going toe-to-toe w\ the big boys (or in this case, just Macroshaft).
Seriously, I hear what you're saying.
Wadda mean? Other people can read this?!
'Net radio is getting a reprieve, for now...
http://blog.wired.com/music/2007/07/breaking-news-o.html
http://blog.wired.com/music/2007/07/breaking-news-o.html
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
This one sez a federal court denied a stay on royalties. So now I'm not sure what up.
http://investing.reuters.co.uk/news....2340366
http://investing.reuters.co.uk/news....2340366
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
It makes more sense for SoundExchange to not enforce the fees and allow internet radio to remain on the air. If they enforce the fees and drive all these stations offline, then what? However, by letting them stay up and working out a fee they're ensuring a new stream of revenue.
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
That would make sense, though. Since when has this whole situation been handled in a sensible manner?
I think if internet radio folded, the RIAA would be thrilled. As would the big record companies and of course traditional radio stations. They keep trying to shove everything back into the box, even though that's not possible.
I think if internet radio folded, the RIAA would be thrilled. As would the big record companies and of course traditional radio stations. They keep trying to shove everything back into the box, even though that's not possible.
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"