Leisher wrote:If you guys get the island, I'll stock it with gently used women...and someone for Cake.
If It Works In Healthcare
-
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:58 pm
-
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:58 pm
-
- Posts: 1393
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 12:59 pm
Actually they ditched her in Oregon, but that is just nit pickingGORDON wrote:I have a close relative that was with Jim Jones's congregation as he was relocating around the US, prior to Guyana.Malcolm wrote:Really? Explain.GORDON wrote:And I am connected to Jim Jones closer than all y'all are, probably.
Wacko nut jobs are fascinating studies, particularly when their shows of bravado can trick a lot of sheep. All my buddies are somewhat creeped out when the History or Discovery channel does the usual special on psychos & I name them off by photo before the narrator.
She was so crazy, though, that Jones ditched her in California.
Too cray for Jim Jones? That's crazy.
I have a question. Here in Ohio we have mandatory car insurance. Liability. I was once put throu some shit about one of my licenced vehicles in my driveway that I didn't drive so I didn't insure. But I'll bet half the east side of Toledo doesn't carry insurance. Even thou it is a state law. I have to carry uninsured motorist on my policy. But technically there shouldn't be any.
Does anyone think I'll be getting the short end of the stick when it came to government run health insurance?
Does anyone think I'll be getting the short end of the stick when it came to government run health insurance?
In marriage there is always one person right. And the other one is the husband.
God I hope that was sarcasm.TPRJones wrote:I'm going to assume that was sarcasm.TheCatt wrote:Well, if government created the problem, surely they know how to fix it too.
Sometimes it seem like our government has the opposite touch of good king Midas. Instead of everything turning to gold it turns to shit.
In marriage there is always one person right. And the other one is the husband.
Well, government screws a lot of things up, but government absolutely should run health care because health care is a basic human right.
Tell me you haven't heard someone say that with a straight face.
I've heard it on this very forum, in the past.
Edited By GORDON on 1182643648
Tell me you haven't heard someone say that with a straight face.
I've heard it on this very forum, in the past.
Edited By GORDON on 1182643648
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
This distinction holds that "Positive" human rights mainly follow from the Rousseauian Continental European legal tradition and denote entitlements that the state is obliged to protect and provide. Examples of such rights include: the rights to education, to health care, to a livelihood. Such 'positive rights' have been codified in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Articles 22-28) and in many 20th-century constitutions.
So, Supposedly the state has been sadled with the job. Health care is by this statement a right. And I'm not sure it is the governments job either but what else is to be done? I personally believe everyone has the right to medical. But how do you make it rigth with everyone?
So, Supposedly the state has been sadled with the job. Health care is by this statement a right. And I'm not sure it is the governments job either but what else is to be done? I personally believe everyone has the right to medical. But how do you make it rigth with everyone?
In marriage there is always one person right. And the other one is the husband.
I ain't read my Rosseau in a long time. But from what I remember of it, I didn't like it much.TPRJones wrote:The Rousseauian Continental European legal tradition sounds like horse shit.
Does it also provide a unversal right to ponies and ice cream?
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."