Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:00 pm
by GORDON
There isn't enough Bowie quoting around here.
From here.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:18 pm
by thibodeaux
If it moves, tax it. If it stops moving, subsidize it.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:26 pm
by GORDON
RR
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:06 pm
by thibodeaux
You sure that wasn't Bowie?
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:11 pm
by GORDON
Only if he was quoting Ronnie.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:42 pm
by TheCatt
For years I've heard the arguments how an internet sales tax was needed, as retail outlets with overhead costs... land and buildings... couldn't compete with online retailers.
Thought the argument was that states and municipalities were losing out on revenue?
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:54 pm
by GORDON
That too, I just didn't want to get too expansive in my point.
They still didn't have what I wanted, so I went to amazon.
Edited By GORDON on 1103064912
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:47 pm
by TheCatt
big tail.
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:13 pm
by mbilderback
I find taxation on the internet to be yet another issue of manipulating the free market for no good reason. If internet companies destroy brick and motor locations, so be it. But I expect there will always be a call for local businesses.