Page 1 of 1

Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 1:36 pm
by Malcolm
Medieval wins. Every variation on penicillin loses out to garlic + cow stomach bile prepared correctly.



Edited By Malcolm on 1427823440

Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 1:48 pm
by Leisher
That's funny.

Re: modern v. medieval science

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:57 pm
by Malcolm
Not exactly the proper topic, but sort of on target. Chem found that can crack even the most resistant of bacteria.
Researchers from the University of Tubingen in Germany have discovered that a nose-dwelling bacteria, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, produces a chemical called lugdunin. The chemical is "bactericidal against major pathogens," and -- crucially -- not prone to developing a resistance in the bugs that it kills.

Re: modern v. medieval science

Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:04 pm
by Malcolm
Nature v. MRSA. Nature wins.
One of the synthetic peptides - Saha-CATH5 - appeared to be particularly effective at killing the superbug methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or MRSA.
That's a peptide derived from the milk of a tasmanian devil.

Re: modern v. medieval science

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:08 am
by Alhazad
Malcolm wrote:Nature v. MRSA. Nature wins.
One of the synthetic peptides - Saha-CATH5 - appeared to be particularly effective at killing the superbug methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or MRSA.
That's a peptide derived from the milk of a tasmanian devil.
Which are going extinct due to contagious cancer. Superbugs win.

Re: modern v. medieval science

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 1:08 pm
by Malcolm
Yeah, I sort of neglected that to mention that. It's only reduced the population by 50%.