Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:59 pm
by Leisher
List.
There's a special place in hell for cock suckers who name their charity similar to Make-A-Wish so they can profit off of people's desire to help dying children.
I'd love to send Malcolm to their homes.
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 1:08 pm
by Malcolm
The ones that have a positive difference between total income and amount paid out and have 0% direct contribution ... how are they considered a charity?
Charities
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2021 2:16 pm
by Leisher
The women that could have been my boo donates ANOTHER $2.74B to charities.
Serious question: How much of that money do you think actually makes its way to people that need it? Do you think it's closer to 100% or 0%? How much that even makes it to the actual cause is spent effectively?
The 50 Worst Charities
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2021 2:24 pm
by TheCatt
Leisher wrote: ↑Wed Jun 16, 2021 2:16 pm
Serious question: How much of that money do you think actually makes its way to people that need it? Do you think it's closer to 100% or 0%? How much that even makes it to the actual cause is spent effectively?
I would guess that she can do enough research to make sure it's going to the effective places, so 80-90%
The 50 Worst Charities
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2021 8:00 pm
by GORDON
From what I hear, >50% is doing pretty well for the average charity.