Page 1 of 1

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 7:20 am
by thibodeaux
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk....scanner
Airport worker given police warning for 'misusing' body scanner

Man, 25, issued with harassment warning after allegedly taking photo of a female colleague at Heathrow
...
The BAA employee took a photo of his co-worker, Jo Margetson, when she inadvertently went through a scanner.

"I can't bear to think about the body scanner thing," she told the Sun. "I'm totally traumatised. I've spoken to the police about it. I'm in too much of a state to go to work."


Poor thing. Of course, the rest of us just have to suck it up, right?

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 7:45 am
by TheCatt
"Air passengers already tolerate a large invasion of their privacy and we do not feel that full-body scanners add greatly to this situation. Privacy concerns should not prevent the deployment of scanners."

Fuck you, buddy.

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:26 am
by thibodeaux
I believe that's called the "slippery slope," "thin end of the wedge," "camels nose," etc.

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:54 am
by TPRJones
The camel's nose was long long ago. We're well past the shoulders now.

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:19 am
by Malcolm
"Having witnessed these full-body scanners working at first-hand, we are confident that the privacy concerns that have been expressed in relation to these devices are overstated and that full-body scanners are no more an invasion of privacy than manual "pat-downs" or searches of bags," the committee said.

Their security folk must have x-ray vision.

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:58 pm
by GORDON
Are they suggesting I can pat down any woman I want without breaking any laws?



Edited By GORDON on 1269622771

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:05 pm
by Malcolm
Let's see all the lawmakers that voted for these monstrosities have to walk through one each & every day on their way to work. Because, you know, you can't sacrifice security at critical levels of government. & staffed by the same fuckwit incompetents at your standard airport.