Page 1 of 1
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 5:25 pm
by GORDON
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 5:40 pm
by Malcolm
He says lawmakers, if they revisit the issue, should "look beyond criminalization and resist calls from the pressure groups opposed to alcohol to more productive solutions like education and counselors."
Yeah, whatever. We're America. We don't investigate & question things. We just ban shit outright now.
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 5:50 pm
by TheCatt
Wait. Wait, wait, wait, wait. Someone reads a constitution and reads it as-is?
McCulloch argues Article 17, Section 14 of the state constitution conditionally gives those 18 and over the "full legal rights and responsibilities" of all other adults, with one exception -- the General Assembly can restrict the sale of alcohol.
But that section of the constitution does not specifically address consumption or possession.
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 6:25 pm
by GORDON
TheCatt wrote:Wait. Wait, wait, wait, wait. Someone reads a constitution and reads it as-is?
McCulloch argues Article 17, Section 14 of the state constitution conditionally gives those 18 and over the "full legal rights and responsibilities" of all other adults, with one exception -- the General Assembly can restrict the sale of alcohol.
But that section of the constitution does not specifically address consumption or possession.
I know! And SC was the first state to ask Union troops to leave their territory, and even back up their words.
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 6:49 pm
by thibodeaux
About freakin' time.
Too bad whatshisname screwed the Porteña.