Supreme court rules against discrimination

Stuff we should click on.  Be sure to state Not Work Safe, if applicable.  KTHX.
Post Reply
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53998
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

article
The U.S. Supreme Court sided Monday with white firefighters in their workplace discrimination lawsuit, a divisive case over the role race should play in job advancement.

In the split 5-4 vote, a majority of the justices ruled that the city of New Haven, Connecticut, improperly threw out the results of promotional exams that officials said left too few minorities qualified.

Only one Latino and no African-American firefighters qualified for promotion based on the exam; the city subsequently decided not to certify the results and issued no promotions.

A group of 20 mostly white firefighters sued, claiming "reverse discrimination."

High court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor heard the case on her federal appeals court last year and sided with the city.

The Supreme Court was being asked to decide whether there was a continued need for special treatment for minorities, or whether enough progress has been made to make existing laws obsolete, especially in a political atmosphere where an African-American occupies the White House.

"Fear of litigation alone cannot justify an employer's reliance on race to the detriment of individuals who passed the examinations and qualified for promotions," wrote Justice Anthony Kennedy for the majority.
Don't Miss

The case has received added attention because Sotomayor was on the appellate court that dismissed the appeal of 19 white and one Latino firefighters.

Sotomayor was part of a three-judge panel that ruled in February 2008 to uphold a lower court decision supporting New Haven's decision to throw out the results.

In June 2008, Sotomayor was part of a 7-6 majority that denied a rehearing of the case by the full court.


Legal analysts said they expected Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee will want to ask Sotomayor about her role in that case, as well as her comments about ethnicity and the bench.
It's not me, it's someone else.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 54575
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

What a wise decision by that Latina lady. As a white man I certainly could not have made such a ruling as well as she did, due to her experiences as a Latina woman.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65639
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Post by Leisher »

Good title of this thread Catt. It is discrimination.

Why do so many people, of all colors and creeds, think racism is only a white person's crime, that nobody is racist to whites, and that whites are immune to the effects of racism? Those same people always talk about how racism is ignorance, yet don't see the ignorance in their own words.

"Hello Pot? This is the kettle."
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by Malcolm »

This is precisely the sort of thing she should get raked over the coals for. & won't.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Post Reply