The Republican Party
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2021 10:48 am
Maybe he's been watching too much TV.Leisher wrote: ↑Fri Jun 18, 2021 10:47 am R candidate threatens another R candidate's life with Ukrainian hit squad.
Insanity.
Maybe he's been watching too much TV.Leisher wrote: ↑Fri Jun 18, 2021 10:47 am R candidate threatens another R candidate's life with Ukrainian hit squad.
Insanity.
They've done a 180.The early Republican Party consisted of northern Protestants, factory workers, professionals, businessmen, prosperous farmers, and after 1866, former black slaves. The party had very little support from white Southerners at the time, who predominantly backed the Democratic Party in the Solid South, and from Catholics, who made up a major Democratic voting block.
The super cults of both sides are "all in". There is nothing that can be explained or show to them to get them off of their beliefs. Maybe it's ignorance, maybe it's pride, but it cannot be broken. To be brutally honest, the country would be MUCH healthier if they all just went away forever.
Seriously, too bad he committed political suicideLeisher wrote: ↑Mon Jun 28, 2021 10:30 am Another R takes a public shot at MTG.
He also said Trump was a "loser president".
I don't know who is in charge of the GOP, but it should be this guy.
Are all Wyoming people this dumb? Seriously, I don't think I've ever met anyone from there.“In the immortal words of the 45th President of the United States of America, Donald J. Trump ...'You’re Fired!'” read recent letters to Cheney from GOP officials in Park and Carbon counties.
...
The Wyoming votes are largely symbolic. The Republican Party can withdraw or withhold support from GOP officeholders and candidates in a variety of ways but can’t oust anybody from the party.
Republican state Rep. Tony Lovasco, who according to his legislative biography has worked in software deployment and maintenance, tweeted Thursday that “it’s clear the Governor’s Office has a fundamental misunderstanding of both web technology and industry standard procedures for reporting security vulnerabilities.
State Sen. Bryan Hughes, an East Texas Republican who wrote Senate Bill 3, denied that the law requires teachers to provide opposing views on what he called matters of “good and evil” or to get rid of books that offer only one perspective on the Holocaust.
“That’s not what the bill says,” Hughes said in an interview Wednesday when asked about the Carroll book guidelines. “I’m glad we can have this discussion to help elucidate what the bill says, because that’s not what the bill says.”
Some people do consider the Holocaust debatable or controversial. Where does Texas draw that line? Why does big government have to step in all the time to tell people how to live?A section of the bill caused controversy that "teachers can’t be forced to discuss current events or widely debated controversial issues," and teachers would also, "to the best of their ability, give diverse perspectives without deference to any one perspective."