Welcome to Thunderdome

.... the dog is in it. With a cape.

That's strikes 1, 2, and .9, with me.

I didn't mind Krypto. It was cute. If Krypto dies though...

I also liked that it appears that added other visual differences to Clark.

What I did mind is that all the outfits look low budget. Superman needs to see a tailor because his suit doesn't fit.

Also, seemed like there is a heavy focus on Lois and Clark's romance. I hope they don't make out on top of the corpses of tens of thousands of people like they did in Man of Steel.

The guy playing Superman I feel sorry for because Henry Cavill, literally, looks like the way Superman was drawn. Going to be tough following him.

Others in it:
-Guy Gardner (the white green lantern with the bad haircut)
-That might be Jon Stewart (black green lantern who took over after Hal Jordan died, but didn't...it's a whole thing)
-Mr. Terrific (black dude in the protective bubble)
-Hawkgirl (obvious)
-Lex Luthor played by Nicolaus Holt who looks great and then terrible depending on angle and lighting. Dude can act, so we'll see how this goes.
-I don't know the robot Superman is consoling, but they appear to be in the Fortress of Solitude.

James Gunn knows what he's doing, so it should be good, but will it be great?

But the dog is in it and has a cape.

Source material accurate, so...no issue.

Source material is sometimes completely outdated and becomes stupid.

No, not stupid. Retarded. The dog cape is fucking retarded.

FLY, DOG! FLY!

Well, I could be wrong. This movie could be aimed at children under 6. They would probably like a caped dog.

Who wouldn't like a caped dog? Also, what's the alternative, a caped cat?

TheCatt wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2024 12:30 pm Who wouldn't like a caped dog?

Right?

They should have the dog also wear red underwear on the outside because that also isn't weird. At all.

GORDON wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:17 pm They should have the dog also wear red underwear on the outside because that also isn't weird. At all.

Stop sexualizing the dog.

Critical Drinker shares my opinion. His opinion about the trailer was, basically, "aside from the dog and suit it looks ok "

Part of this look cool, parts o this look retarded.

1. The fucking dog with a cape made me think this was made for people graduating from Teletubbies.
2. The red diaper looks really dumb. I understand it's comic accurate, but sensibilities change and now it looks really dumb. Gunn should have accounted for that. That was part of the praise of the first X-Men movie... it was brought up to current sensibilities and people wouldn't have liked yellow and purple spandex (which I still think looked retarded in Deadpool 3).
3. Fortress aesthetic was interesting. I guess I don't know what the point is if it just erupts from the ice as needed. I guess the robots are under the ice as well or something.
4. The goofy robots have the potential to be great, or retarded AF. We'll see.

1. I didn't mind the dog in the first teaser. I did here. Dogs know when you're hurt.
2. I'm not a big Superman person, but I have not heard people say it's comic accurate. Quite the opposite in fact.
3. I did like the fortress concept of only springing up when he's around.
4. Why would one gush about him. It's a robot. Someone programmed that shit. Ugh. Him thanking them while being in immense pain is on brand for Supes though.

I never noticed, but there are a lot of similarities. I do not think Gunn is stealing the previous story though.

Maybe James Gunn really is a Marvel plant sent to destroy DC?

Sabotage or a great example of extreme hubris. Who acts like this during their movie's opening weekend? Especially when reviews are very mixed. Did we learn nothing from Rachel Zeigler?

It was good. Not great. Maybe only fine.

But I did love the very, very end. That song is awesome