Welcome to Thunderdome

Numbers rising.

They call it rape, but I think that's too far. There was consent for the deed, so now we're just discussing the conditions of the act. However, I do think it's sexual assault, but maybe we need a new term like how Manslaughter < Homicide.

Also, since this has a name, what do we call it when a woman tells a man she's on the pill even though she isn't?

Leisher wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 6:10 pm They call it rape, but I think that's too far. There was consent for the deed, so now we're just discussing the conditions of the act. However, I do think it's sexual assault, but maybe we need a new term like how Manslaughter < Homicide.

"I want a barrier between your penis and me"
"OK"
*removes barrier*

I can see why people would call it rape. There's no consent to the act. I see putting a penis with a condom inside as completely different than without.

TheCatt wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 7:29 pm I see putting a penis with a condom inside as completely different than without.

It is 100% different, but I still think it's not quite as bad as outright rape. It's still definitely something that should be a crime, but we have qualifications for murder, and I think there should be qualifications here.

We all know that rape is as much about power as it is about sex. I don't think slipping off the condom is about power. It is about sexual gratification at the expense of someone else though.

I'm not saying it should be forgiven. I'm just saying Johnny-23 is a different predator than some college douche who thinks condoms get in the way of his fun. Maybe instead of 8 years in prison it starts at 4 with additional years if a pregnancy or STD is a result?

They're both scum. I just think there is probably more chance of rehabilitation for someone who tried to skip a condom versus the alternative.

More like Johnny-500 if they knew the truth.

Doesn't quite have the same ring to it. Still, I despise rapists. For me, you're somewhere between a cockroach and that white stuff that accumulates at the corner of your mouth when you're really thirsty. But in your case I'll make an exception.

Should be a separate crime, but it's also tough. Condoms break. Or at least they used to when I needed them. Manufacturer defect sending you in jail would suuuuck.

Troy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 9:43 am Condoms break. Or at least they used to when I need them.

Only ever happened to me once, and it was very noticeable.

Troy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 9:43 am Condoms break. Or at least they used to when I need them.

Excellent point. It also showcases a huge problem with rape cases overall in that they're very difficult to prove.

We all have smartphones now. How long before some enterprising mind figures out that consent can be recorded really quickly by both parties and then sent to the cloud?

We all have smartphones now. How long before some enterprising mind figures out that consent can be recorded really quickly by both parties and then sent to the cloud?

Johnny-23 in the year 2040: Expert hacker and unstoppable rapist.

Blockchain to the rescue!

That might only be funny to the absolute nerdiest among us. (Or those who really follow tech news.)

Leisher wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:43 am Blockchain to the rescue!

That might only be funny to the absolute nerdiest among us. (Or those who really follow tech news.)

Fuck waiting 45m for the transaction to clear though. The mood has passed and were watching animal planet.

e: also wouldn't that put a participants related sexual history FOREVER out there? Hilarious premise.

The transaction fails to clear when the computers across the planet talk to each other and realize your actually related.

Incels buying server farms trying to mine free sex tokens.

Leisher wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 10:26 am

Troy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 9:43 am Condoms break. Or at least they used to when I need them.

Excellent point. It also showcases a huge problem with rape cases overall in that they're very difficult to prove.

We all have smartphones now. How long before some enterprising mind figures out that consent can be recorded really quickly by both parties and then sent to the cloud?

They're already there