Yet somehow as i watched it, i knew Detroit was going to blow it.
And poor Justin Fields got a baptism by fire today. Sacked 9 times..
NFL
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2021 8:42 am
by TheCatt
TheCatt wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 2:32 pm
My fantasy team keeps being the luckiest fucking team on earth, which ruins my draft, and thus my team keeps sucking.
Jesus is, of course, the team I played, and we have 0 players tonight.
This week: 4th worst (out of 12) in points. My opponent? 3rd worst.
NFL
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2021 9:18 am
by Leisher
TheCatt wrote: ↑Sun Sep 26, 2021 12:45 pm
La'el Collins allegedly tried to bribe drug test collector.
Saw that story yesterday. Guy's a complete idiot and it should be a season ban for what he did.
The issue is that there was no definitive angle that showed a TD. Dak was blocked from every angle but one, and that angle had him reaching, but unsure where he was due to him being invisible every where else.
It probably was a TD, but I can see why they said what they said.
NFL
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 8:59 am
by Leisher
I thought it was an obvious TD live, but apparently the side judges couldn't see.
NFL
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 9:11 am
by TheCatt
Leisher wrote: ↑Wed Sep 29, 2021 8:59 am
I thought it was an obvious TD live, but apparently the side judges couldn't see.
Given the importance of the goal line, it seems odd that there aren't cameras positioned above it in the stadium.
NFL
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 8:12 pm
by TheCatt
Leisher wrote: ↑Wed Sep 29, 2021 8:59 am
I thought it was an obvious TD live, but apparently the side judges couldn't see.
You know what's really weird? There's an RFID chip inside the football that tells the NFL where it is 25 times a second, but they don't use that to tell.
NFL
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 9:03 am
by Leisher
What's weird is how nobody in the media has asked why the NFL doesn't use it.
NFL
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 9:15 am
by TheCatt
Leisher wrote: ↑Thu Sep 30, 2021 9:03 am
What's weird is how nobody in the media has asked why the NFL doesn't use it.
TO be fair, the NY Times did, 4 years ago, and the NFL said it wasn't precise enough.
They are accurate to within six inches of the ball, which wouldn’t help when the most contentious calls come down to much smaller distances.
Which feels like it might have been enough on that TD call, imho.
Ah...
But the N.F.L. has challenges other sports don’t face. A Hawk-Eye spokesman told ESPN in 2015 that the cluster of players around first-down and goal-line plays could make its system useless because 25 percent of the ball must be clearly visible for it to work. Hawk-Eye did not respond to a message seeking comment.
But, as long as the Hawk-Eye sensors were above the play, they would have worked for the Dallas call, since it was uncovered from the top.
Also, the article's 4 years old, I don't doubt they could be a little more accurate by now.