Welcome to Thunderdome

ok.

Try making a cogent point.

TheCatt wrote:

GORDON wrote: Because I hate lairs.

Yet you still play D&D.

I got it.

Vince wrote: The Democrats are more honest about what they are (especially as of late).

I actually disagree with this to a point. As long as Dems wrap themselves in social issues to distract from their actual policies, then they're not being honest. Not to mention their efforts to legalize illegals for votes, I mean, "humanitarian reasons". But that being said, they've been far more open about embracing socialism.

Leisher wrote:Not to mention their efforts to legalize illegals for votes, I mean, "humanitarian reasons".

They've reached the point they're all but saying they want to decriminalize the border crossings now. I just find that amazing. They aren't being open about the "why", but they are being open about that part of it.

I look at how batshit crazy the Democrats have gotten and wonder how Trump could lose in 2020. Then I look at Trump and wonder how he could win. I think it's certain that if he loses next year, it will have been an issue of his greatest opponent being Trump.

Leisher wrote:

TheCatt wrote:

GORDON wrote: Because I hate lairs.

Yet you still play D&D.

I got it.

Is the implication that playing a game is dishonest?

GORDON wrote: Is the implication that playing a game is dishonest?

lairs. You said "lairs" instead of "liars"

Ahhhhh. I didn't realize that.

A few years back, there was a billboard in Toledo for some local politician and someone had spray painted "LIER" across it. That gave me a chuckle.

Texas GOP speaker gets recorded saying things politicians say and it's a huge scandal in Texas...or not.

I hate politicians sooooo much.

This part right here is all you need to know about why Dems want illegals made into legal, voting residents immediately.

Since the GOP reached a peak of a 101-49 super-majority in 2011, Democrats have tapped into a growing Hispanic population and liberal shifts in suburban areas to shrink that gap.

Sounds reasonable.

Leisher wrote: Romney had a fake Twitter account he used to defend and promote himself.

Doesn't everyone? I have 3 twitter accounts. I mean, how else would that shithole place get so many users?

I only have 1. I'm a nerd.

Leisher wrote: I only have 1. I'm a nerd.

Where else can I tweet nonsense at professional athletes? Just one though.

I have one that's me/personal, one that's for technology stuff/professional, and one that's garbage (retweet this for a contest, etc)

If they're not removing the "insurance" companies, the plan will be shit.

GORDON wrote: If they're not removing the "insurance" companies, the plan will be shit.

Well, I read the article, and the 'plan' doesn't really do much at all, and it certainly does not do that.

I looked at the first couple sentences, and could tell they weren't going to eliminate a major lobbying money supplier.

Lobbying money that comes from insurance premiums, one presumes. People fund their own ass-fuckings.

GORDON wrote: I looked at the first couple sentences, and could tell they weren't going to eliminate a major lobbying money supplier.

That's why none of the government plans are worth a shit.

Republicans want to spy on kids to prevent school shootings.

At first read, this pissed me off. Upon thinking about it, while I'm genuinely concerned for privacy, this will probably stop more shootings than any gun laws.

Although, alternatively to this new spying program, parents could just actually be parents and monitor what their kids are up to...