Welcome to Thunderdome

Epstein's grand jury stuff from 2006 being released. Doesn't look like names are in it.

Elon's on a roll. Another post Catt will probably agree with.

He must really have something out for Trump.

Dude's got to feel pretty secure calling out/taking on the FBI like that. It's basically taking on the US government. And I think they still have more resources than Elon, since they can outspend way into deficit.

TheCatt wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2024 8:57 am He must really have something out for Trump.

As opposed to all the people voting for Biden despite him molesting his daughter...

Sorry, couldn't resist the zinger.

Seriously, it doesn't matter if it's Trump, Biden, AOC, Fetterman, DeNiro, Gates, Zuckerberg, Tom Brady, or anyone else.

If they were a client, arrest them, prosecute them, and bury them under the prison. If there was someone pulling strings and using this info to control our government, stock markets, or whatever, execute them.

It does seem weird how both sides are like "nothing to see here"

TheCatt wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2024 12:55 pm It does seem weird how both sides are like "nothing to see here"

We already know they're corrupt. Now we wonder who they work for and why.

This guy is awesome.

Not only is she trying to normalize pedos, she's equating them to gay people.

And some wonder why so many LGB people want nothing to do with the rest of the alphabet...

This feels recycled.

Countdown to election. That particular gem is to get people disgusted by the left.

TheCatt wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2024 4:19 pm This feels recycled.

Is your argument that people no longer think this way, and thus, this cannot be recent?

I'd guesstimate that 95% of all media that reaches your eyeballs is someone selling something.

I'd love to see how much us being spent on marketing/propaganda by the parties. Real numbers, including the "also a million dollars for a scholarship fund" that only is available to the kid of a billionaire who owns sixty newspapers.

GORDON wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:43 am I'd guesstimate that 95% of all media that reaches your eyeballs is someone selling something.

If you're talking solely economically, then 95% is way off. If you're including "changing minds" with financial interests, then sure.

However, pedos associating with the alphabet people has been going on for a long, long time. I remember NAMBLA marching in Pride parades in the 80s.

Point being, no matter when this tweet was tweeted, it's still relevant. Stupid doesn't just go away. Ask the Flat Earthers.

No, I don't mean just economically. I mean a point of view. I've said before, no one spends hundreds of millions to get a job that pays $400k per year. Additionally, no one has a $50 million marketing budget to get JUST that job. TV and radio buys are obvious, the insidious shit is the millions spent on social media, people pretending to be "just folks with a point of view." They spread the message they're paid to spread. The ones with high likes, and reposts, because they can turn a phrase, get paid more. And someone not paying attention believes it, and repeats it. And ultimately, 95% of everything that reaches your eyeballs is the result of someone selling something, even if just a candidate.

And sometimes people aren't even paid to do it, they think they're serving some higher goal because they have a deeper insight to shit, and feel the universe wants them to make other people better. I used to be like this, and maybe I'm doing that with this post. But these people, when they're at it for a little while and realize they aren't swaying anyone, then get nasty, and start figuratively yelling into peoples' faces how they are fucking morons, who have the opinions they do. Division happen. More eyeballs see more advertising. And it becomes common knowledge that the left is full of pedophiles, and the AP is bold enough to just make a headline, "Trump lies about Kamala being black" or just some shit. And did you hear JD Vance fucks couches? People are selling it, hard, either for money, or just a morality boner.

The other day I saw a good meme:
Person 1: "I hear you're dating my old gf."
Person 2: "Yeah."
Person 1 posts a picture of a good looking pizza: "Here, you can also have my leftovers from the new Dominos New York Crust pizza."

Sick burn, right?

It's the "New!" that caught my eye. It's rated PG-13 viral marketing. "Sponsored" appears nowhere in it, but a hundred thousand people repost it. The guy in the office on Madison Avenue just made his nut for the year, with that one.

95% of everything we're exposed to is advertising. A more cynical word to use is propaganda.

Sure, but this probably isn't the topic for this conversation because I wasn't posting something to make a political statement. There have been people advocating for pedos for a long time and not just in an election cycle.

This isn't, to use one of your examples, Kamala pretending she hasn't played up her Indian heritage her whole career only to forget about it recently so she can pander to black voters. (Trump's statement was stupid. Kamala is half black. What she's not is African-American.)

Like murder there's no statute of limitations on someone promoting pedophilia.

We got off on a tangent. Well, I did. I've been seeing the news aggregators going heavy-anti-trump, and it has me thinking a certain way. The AP thing was real, they straight-up called him a liar in a headline. You know, not reporting the news.... making a statement.

I remember that NAMBLA was public and not that long ago.

I jus think people bring it up now not because they are worried about kids and alphabet-clubs, because they don't do shit about it, ever. They want their team to win.

GORDON wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 12:52 pm I jus think people bring it up now not because they are worried about kids and alphabet-clubs, because they don't do shit about it, ever. They want their team to win.

Yeah, I understand your tangent. It's like how Ds talk about codifying Roe v Wade every election cycle, but have never done shit. Kamala's got a new ad going saying it again, AND how she'll change the Constitution to add it. That statement alone should disqualify her from the job for anyone without bias. She's either blatantly lying or has so little clue about how our government works that she believes she would have that power. Pick one.

Anyway, that should all move to a different thread.

Back to my original post: I debate if pedos or their enablers are worse.

Leisher wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:32 am

TheCatt wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2024 4:19 pm This feels recycled.

Is your argument that people no longer think this way, and thus, this cannot be recent?

just feels trolly. Maybe 1 idiot thinks this way, maybe 100. Not enough to care about

Leisher wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 10:29 amNAMBLA

I only learned what this was when I met you sickos.