Page 2 of 3

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:37 am
by Paul
GORDON wrote:It's frikkin Hoth out there.

Good thing I got pics.
pxplzthx!

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:45 am
by GORDON
The Gordon Family Truckster surrounded to the hood by feral drifts.
Image

Forced perspective makes the snowblower look bigger. The drift was actually a foot taller than the tallest point of the machine.
Image

And this is like a 6 foot guy walking through the snow valley. Look out for Wampas, dood!
Image

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:57 am
by WSGrundy
This kicks so much ass! After the first few months I was completely prepared for a shitty winter and while it wasn't the blizzard the weather men were suggesting it might be, it is good enough.

I do feel bad for those bastards that were going to pick something up for Valentines Day on the way home from work though.

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:00 pm
by Paul
Image

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:54 pm
by Leisher
I do feel bad for those bastards that were going to pick something up for Valentines Day on the way home from work though.


Fantastic observation. I'd wager there are a lot of fights today due to guys and girls being caught without a card and/or gift.

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:21 pm
by unkbill
Cakedaddy wrote:First off, they alway over predict. If you get even 6 inches, I'll give you a dollar. Plus, even if you get the full 14 inches, at least there's no danger of it destroying your house. You know, like a hurricane could.

Neat cheerleader.
Think ya owe Gordo a buck.

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:30 pm
by Cakedaddy
Drifts don't count!! How much snow actually fell down there?

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:37 pm
by GORDON
I actually have no clue. Lots of wind though, obviously.

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 8:26 pm
by WSGrundy
What constitutes a blizzard to you? I keep hearing on the TV about the blizzard of 07. IMO if you can be out and driving your car around the next afternoon with no issues then it wasn't a blizzard.



Edited By WSGrundy on 1171502784

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 8:39 pm
by unkbill
In our area it was 8.0 inches.
As for a blizzard. It is strong sustained winds with heavy snowfall. Not a time duration.

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:50 am
by Cakedaddy
I agree with grundy. If most people made it to work and you can be out in it with no issues by the afternoon, it wasn't a blizzard.

I'm surprised they weren't calling it "Death Storm '07". Why stop at "Blizzard"?

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:12 am
by GORDON
One local news station was calling it the "Big Blast."

Sounded sort of sexual, to me.

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:50 am
by Mommy Dearest
It was a blizzard. The Burger King across from my office was closed. Of course I was at work ignoring the level 3 threat to arrest me if I was on the street.

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:36 pm
by WSGrundy
Mommy Dearest wrote:It was a blizzard. The Burger King across from my office was closed. Of course I was at work ignoring the level 3 threat to arrest me if I was on the street.
I understand now that it was a blizzard I just don't think I agree with the requirements. Blizzard to me just seems more severe then what I saw. Technically if the conditions are right for just one second then a blizzard struck.

IMO a blizzard should be more on the hurricane end of things. If I want to go out and pick up a few things and someone tells me that there is going to be some heavy rain I will still go out if I want that stuff because the rain isn't going to stop me. If they tell me there is going to be a hurricane I am definitely not going outside unless it is to leave the area completely. I think a blizzard should be you are forced to stay home for a few days. I think we had a snow storm(thunder storm) instead of a blizzard(hurricane).

There are some areas with lots of farmer fields where snow drifts and such can build up and cause lots of problems and not having as many salt trucks and plows can be difficult. In my area if you were still stuck indoors the next afternoon then it wasn't because of the snow it was because you were a pussy.

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 1:47 pm
by Mommy Dearest
Blizzards consist of sustained winds for over 3 hours. Not just seconds. Don't remember the amount that the winds have to stay at.

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:37 pm
by TheCatt
A violent snowstorm with winds blowing at a minimum speed of 35 miles (56 kilometers) per hour and visibility of less than one-quarter mile (400 meters) for three hours.

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:52 pm
by Cakedaddy
It could snow, with no wind for 5 days dumping six foot of snow, but not be a blizzard? But it can dump 1 inch per hour, for three hours, be really windy, and it's a blizzard? What's the definition of 'violent'? The snow puts a cap in your ass? Whips out a jammy and flat blasts you, while messing up it's $3500 linx coat?

That seems more like a southern definition of a blizzard. :-)

I don't think what we had the last two days should be put in the same class as what we had back in the '70's. I'm dissapointed that it is.

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:04 pm
by Vince
This was the global warming version of a blizzard.

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:21 pm
by GORDON
Yeah, plus in the 70's we were experiencing global cooling, so it is two different extremes.

Category 1 hurricanes are lame, too, but still hurricanes.

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:41 pm
by Vince
But a global cooling cat one hurricane is a pussy hurricane.